The missing link: Developing a safety case for perception components in automated driving
Salay, Rick, Czarnecki, Krzysztof, Kuwajima, Hiroshi, Yasuoka, Hirotoshi, Nakae, Toshihiro, Abdelzad, Vahdat, Huang, Chengjie, Kahn, Maximilian, Nguyen, Van Duong
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Safety assurance is a central concern for the development and societal acceptance of automated driving (AD) systems. Perception is a key aspect of AD that relies heavily on Machine Learning (ML). Despite the known challenges with the safety assurance of ML-based components, proposals have recently emerged for unit-level safety cases addressing these components. Unfortunately, AD safety cases express safety requirements at the system-level and these efforts are missing the critical linking argument connecting safety requirements at the system-level to component performance requirements at the unit-level. In this paper, we propose a generic template for such a linking argument specifically tailored for perception components. The template takes a deductive and formal approach to define strong traceability between levels. We demonstrate the applicability of the template with a detailed case study and discuss its use as a tool to support incremental development of perception components.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Aug-30-2021
- Country:
- Asia > Japan
- Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.14)
- Europe > Germany
- Baden-Württemberg > Karlsruhe Region > Karlsruhe (0.04)
- North America > Canada
- Ontario > Waterloo Region > Waterloo (0.04)
- Asia > Japan
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.50)
- Industry:
- Automobiles & Trucks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Robotics & Automation (0.70)
- Transportation > Ground
- Road (1.00)
- Technology: