CgAT: Center-Guided Adversarial Training for Deep Hashing-Based Retrieval
Wang, Xunguang, Lin, Yiqun, Li, Xiaomeng
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Deep hashing has been extensively utilized in massive image retrieval because of its efficiency and effectiveness. However, deep hashing models are vulnerable to adversarial examples, making it essential to develop adversarial defense methods for image retrieval. Existing solutions achieved limited defense performance because of using weak adversarial samples for training and lacking discriminative optimization objectives to learn robust features. In this paper, we present a min-max based Center-guided Adversarial Training, namely CgAT, to improve the robustness of deep hashing networks through worst adversarial examples. Specifically, we first formulate the center code as a semantically-discriminative representative of the input image content, which preserves the semantic similarity with positive samples and dissimilarity with negative examples. We prove that a mathematical formula can calculate the center code immediately. After obtaining the center codes in each optimization iteration of the deep hashing network, they are adopted to guide the adversarial training process. On the one hand, CgAT generates the worst adversarial examples as augmented data by maximizing the Hamming distance between the hash codes of the adversarial examples and the center codes. On the other hand, CgAT learns to mitigate the effects of adversarial samples by minimizing the Hamming distance to the center codes. Extensive experiments on the benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our adversarial training algorithm in defending against adversarial attacks for deep hashing-based retrieval. Compared with the current state-of-the-art defense method, we significantly improve the defense performance by an average of 18.61\%, 12.35\%, and 11.56\% on FLICKR-25K, NUS-WIDE, and MS-COCO, respectively. The code is available at https://github.com/xunguangwang/CgAT.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Mar-25-2023
- Country:
- North America
- United States
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.05)
- Nevada > Clark County
- Las Vegas (0.04)
- Arizona > Maricopa County
- Phoenix (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Utah > Salt Lake County
- Salt Lake City (0.04)
- Tennessee > Davidson County
- Nashville (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- California
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.15)
- Texas > Travis County
- Canada
- Quebec
- Montreal (0.04)
- Capitale-Nationale Region
- Québec (0.04)
- Quebec City (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- Alberta > Census Division No. 15
- Improvement District No. 9 > Banff (0.04)
- Quebec
- United States
- Europe
- Asia
- Singapore (0.04)
- China
- Hong Kong (0.04)
- Guangdong Province > Shenzhen (0.04)
- North America
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)