From Knowledge Representation to Knowledge Organization and Back
Giunchiglia, Fausto, Bagchi, Mayukh
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Knowledge Representation (KR) and facet-analytical Knowledge Organization (KO) have been the two most prominent methodologies of data and knowledge modelling in the Artificial Intelligence community and the Information Science community, respectively. KR boasts of a robust and scalable ecosystem of technologies to support knowledge modelling while, often, underemphasizing the quality of its models (and model-based data). KO, on the other hand, is less technology-driven but has developed a robust framework of guiding principles (canons) for ensuring modelling (and model-based data) quality. This paper elucidates both the KR and facet-analytical KO methodologies in detail and provides a functional mapping between them. Out of the mapping, the paper proposes an integrated KO-enriched KR methodology with all the standard components of a KR methodology plus the guiding canons of modelling quality provided by KO. The practical benefits of the methodological integration has been exemplified through a prominent case study of KR-based image annotation exercise.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jan-8-2024
- Country:
- Asia > India (0.04)
- Europe
- Denmark > North Jutland
- Aalborg (0.04)
- Greece (0.04)
- Ireland (0.04)
- Italy > Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
- Trentino Province > Trento (0.04)
- Denmark > North Jutland
- North America
- Canada > Quebec
- Estrie Region > Sherbrooke (0.04)
- United States
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Atlanta (0.04)
- New York (0.04)
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Canada > Quebec
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.82)
- Technology: