LACO: A Latency-Driven Network Slicing Orchestration in Beyond-5G Networks

Network Slicing is expected to become a game changer in the upcoming 5G networks and beyond, enlarging the telecom business ecosystem through still-unexplored vertical industry profits. This implies that heterogeneous service level agreements (SLAs) must be guaranteed per slice given the multitude of predefined requirements. In this paper, we pioneer a novel radio slicing orchestration solution that simultaneously provides latency and throughput guarantees in a multi-tenancy environment. Leveraging on a solid mathematical framework, we exploit the exploration-vs-exploitation paradigm by means of a multi-armed-bandit-based (MAB) orchestrator, LACO, that makes adaptive resource slicing decisions with no prior knowledge on the traffic demand or channel quality statistics. As opposed to traditional MAB methods that are blind to the underlying system, LACO relies on system structure information to expedite decisions. After a preliminary simulations campaign empirically proving the validness of our solution, we provide a robust implementation of LACO using off-the-shelf equipment to fully emulate realistic network conditions: near-optimal results within affordable computational time are measured when LACO is in place. L. Zanzi, V. Sciancalepore, A. Garcia-Saavedra and X. Costa-Pérez are with NEC Laboratories Europe GmbH., 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. The quest for new sources of revenue that revitalizes the mobile industry has spawned an unprecedented hype around the fifth-generation of mobile networks (5G) and, in particular, the network slicing concept. A high-level view of the system considered in this paper is described in Figure 1. The figure represents a series of sliceable base stations as a pool of radio resources (coloured cubes in the figure). The resource allocation process is considered hierarchical: while bundles of radio resources are assigned to different tenants (namely radio slices), each tenant autonomously schedules its bundle of radio resources to each individual user following classic radio scheduling policies. The difference between such operations is subtle but of paramount importance: a slice controller operates at a larger timescale and thus over a coarser granularity [2], [3]. While most prior work on network slicing focuses on average bit-rate guarantees [3], [4], latency considerations have received little attention.