We develop a finite-sample, design-based theory for random forests in which each tree is a randomized conditional predictor acting on fixed covariates and the forest is their Monte Carlo average. An exact variance identity separates Monte Carlo error from a covariance floor that persists under infinite aggregation. The floor arises through two mechanisms: observation reuse, where the same training outcomes receive weight across multiple trees, and partition alignment, where independently generated trees discover similar conditional prediction rules. We prove the floor is strictly positive under minimal conditions and show that alignment persists even when sample splitting eliminates observation overlap entirely. We introduce procedure-aligned synthetic resampling (PASR) to estimate the covariance floor, decomposing the total prediction uncertainty of a deployed forest into interpretable components. For continuous outcomes, resulting prediction intervals achieve nominal coverage with a theoretically guaranteed conservative bias direction. For classification forests, the PASR estimator is asymptotically unbiased, providing the first pointwise confidence intervals for predicted conditional probabilities from a deployed forest. Nominal coverage is maintained across a range of design configurations for both outcome types, including high-dimensional settings. The underlying theory extends to any tree-based ensemble with an exchangeable tree-generating mechanism.

We develop a Coordinate Ascent Variational Inference (CAVI) algorithm for Bayesian Mixed Data Sampling (MIDAS) regression with linear weight parameterizations. The model separates impact coeffcients from weighting function parameters through a normalization constraint, creating a bilinear structure that renders generic Hamiltonian Monte Carlo samplers unreliable while preserving conditional conjugacy exploitable by CAVI. Each variational update admits a closed-form solution: Gaussian for regression coefficients and weight parameters, Inverse-Gamma for the error variance. The algorithm propagates uncertainty across blocks through second moments, distinguishing it from naive plug-in approximations. In a Monte Carlo study spanning 21 data-generating configurations with up to 50 predictors, CAVI produces posterior means nearly identical to a block Gibbs sampler benchmark while achieving speedups of 107x to 1,772x (Table 9). Generic automatic differentiation VI (ADVI), by contrast, produces bias 714 times larger while being orders of magnitude slower, confirming the value of model-specific derivations. Weight function parameters maintain excellent calibration (coverage above 92%) across all configurations. Impact coefficient credible intervals exhibit the underdispersion characteristic of mean-field approximations, with coverage declining from 89% to 55% as the number of predictors grows a documented trade-off between speed and interval calibration that structured variational methods can address. An empirical application to realized volatility forecasting on S&P 500 daily returns cofirms that CAVI and Gibbs sampling yield virtually identical point forecasts, with CAVI completing each monthly estimation in under 10 milliseconds.

AML Trends in 2022: What Y ou Need to Know .

The UN estimates 2-5% of global GDP or $0.8 - $2.0 trillion dollars are laundered

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Reinforcement Learning agent and a configurator that can modify some environmental parameters to improve the agent's performance.

The531 raw RGB values are firstly divided by 256 (i.e.

Additionally, we show generalization performance of our proposed method across differentvisualdomains. Withthegiven problemcategory(task),asubsetforlearning can be sampled (via domain episode module in Figure 4 in main text). Here, by replacingclass with task, K-shot andN-task reasoning framework can be defined. Here, we show analogical learning with the existing meta learning framework for fast adaptation fromthesourcedomain tothetargetdomain.

We experiment with 8 implementations of MoCaD, i.e. two different calibrators combined with four different ensembling strategies as the same as in previous experiments. For Learned-Mixin, the entropy term weight is set to the value suggested by [1]. We run each experiment five times and report the mean scores and the standard deviations. For the Dirichlet calibrator, we use the same configurationasinFEVER. Experimental Results Table 2 shows the experimental result on image classification.