Killing The I-Bank: The Disruption Of Investment Banking - CB Insights Research

Investment banking is seeing its historical profit centers eroded by technology and regulations. Core processes are being automated or commoditized. From IPOs, to M&A, to research and trading, investment banks are getting smaller, leaner, and scrambling to keep up with innovations. In 2006, investment banks were at the top of the finance world. With torrential growth and return on investment (ROI) driven largely by the trading of complex financial instruments, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs and others achieved record profits and awarded unprecedented bonuses. Over the next two years, everything fell apart. Download the free report to learn how core processes of this financial service are being automated or commoditized. After the collapse of Lehman and Bear Stearns and the global financial crisis that ensued, the business models of the world's biggest investment banks needed to change. In the US, legislation emerged to forbid investment banks from prop trading, or trading with their own capital, and forcing them to keep more capital on hand. This regulation reduced trading profits and created a need to cut costs, spurring investment banks to spin off unprofitable divisions or eliminate them entirely. While the rules against prop trading have more recently been loosened, the restriction has still changed how investment banks operate. Moreover, as more and more companies raise large equity rounds they're also choosing to delay public offerings. And even when major tech companies do decide to go public, some, like Spotify and Slack, are doing so mostly without the help of banks. As a result, banks are facing dropping IPO profits: they generated just $7.3B in revenue in 2017 from equity capital markets, which includes IPOs, down an inflation-adjusted 43% since 2000's peak, according to the Wall Street Journal. At the same time, financial upstarts have built technologies that could eventually cut into the relationship-driven work that investment banks are used to doing. Instead of working with a bank to make an acquisition, you can use Axial -- the so-called "Tinder of M&A," for its algorithm-based approach to matching companies with potential buyers. In 2015, 26% of $1B mergers and acquisitions took place without the help of external financial advisors, up 13% from the year before, according to Dealogic.