CP-nets: A Tool for Representing and Reasoning withConditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements
Boutilier, C., Brafman, R. I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H. H., Poole, D.
–Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Information about user preferences plays a key role in automated decision making. In many domains it is desirable to assess such preferences in a qualitative rather than quantitative way. In this paper, we propose a qualitative graphical representation of preferences that reflects conditional dependence and independence of preference statements under a ceteris paribus (all else being equal) interpretation. Such a representation is often compact and arguably quite natural in many circumstances. We provide a formal semantics for this model, and describe how the structure of the network can be exploited in several inference tasks, such as determining whether one outcome dominates (is preferred to) another, ordering a set outcomes according to the preference relation, and constructing the best outcome subject to available evidence.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Feb-1-2004
- Country:
- Asia
- Japan > Honshū
- Chūbu > Aichi Prefecture > Nagoya (0.04)
- Middle East > Israel
- Southern District > Beer-Sheva (0.04)
- Japan > Honshū
- Europe
- North America
- Canada
- Alberta > Census Division No. 11
- Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Alberta > Census Division No. 11
- Mexico (0.04)
- United States
- California
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- San Mateo County > Menlo Park (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- New York > Tompkins County
- Ithaca (0.04)
- Wisconsin > Dane County
- Madison (0.04)
- California
- Canada
- Asia
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine (0.93)
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (1.00)
- Machine Learning (1.00)
- Representation & Reasoning
- Constraint-Based Reasoning (1.00)
- Nonmonotonic Logic (0.67)
- Search (0.68)
- Uncertainty (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence