Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skills
Mäkelä, Elina, Stephany, Fabian
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
The question of whether AI substitutes or complements human work is central to debates on the future of work. This paper examines the impact of AI on skill demand and compensation in the U.S. economy, analysing 12 million online job vacancies from 2018 to 2023. It investigates internal effects (within-job substitution and complementation) and external effects (across occupations, industries, and regions). Our findings reveal a significant increase in demand for AI-complementary skills, such as digital literacy, teamwork, and resilience, alongside rising wage premiums for these skills in AI roles like Data Scientist. Conversely, substitute skills, including customer service and text review, have declined in both demand and value within AI-related positions. Examining external effects, we find a notable rise in demand for complementary skills in non-AI roles linked to the growth of AI-related jobs in specific industries or regions. At the same time, there is a moderate decline in non-AI roles requiring substitute skills. Overall, AI's complementary effect is up to 50% larger than its substitution effect, resulting in net positive demand for skills. These results, replicated for the UK and Australia, highlight AI's transformative impact on workforce skill requirements. They suggest reskilling efforts should prioritise not only technical AI skills but also complementary skills like ethics and digital literacy.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Dec-27-2024
- Country:
- Asia (0.04)
- Europe
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- Brussels (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.14)
- Belgium > Brussels-Capital Region
- North America > United States
- Montana (0.04)
- California (0.14)
- Massachusetts (0.04)
- Mississippi (0.04)
- Kentucky (0.04)
- Wyoming (0.04)
- Pennsylvania (0.04)
- Colorado (0.04)
- Illinois (0.04)
- Virginia (0.04)
- Idaho (0.04)
- Nebraska (0.04)
- Vermont (0.04)
- Louisiana (0.04)
- New Jersey (0.04)
- Ohio (0.04)
- Oklahoma (0.04)
- New Mexico (0.04)
- Iowa (0.04)
- Rhode Island (0.04)
- North Dakota (0.04)
- New Hampshire (0.04)
- Tennessee (0.04)
- Michigan (0.04)
- North Carolina (0.04)
- District of Columbia (0.04)
- Hawaii (0.04)
- Kansas (0.04)
- Maryland (0.04)
- Connecticut (0.04)
- Oregon (0.04)
- South Dakota (0.04)
- Arizona (0.04)
- New York (0.04)
- Wisconsin (0.04)
- Missouri (0.04)
- Texas (0.04)
- Indiana (0.04)
- Nevada (0.04)
- Utah (0.04)
- Minnesota (0.04)
- Alabama (0.04)
- Arkansas (0.04)
- Maine (0.04)
- Alaska (0.04)
- South Carolina (0.04)
- West Virginia (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia (0.24)
- Genre:
- Research Report
- Experimental Study (1.00)
- New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report
- Industry:
- Banking & Finance > Economy (1.00)
- Education (1.00)
- Government > Regional Government
- Health & Medicine (0.93)
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (1.00)
- Machine Learning
- Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks
- Bayesian Learning (0.67)
- Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks
- Natural Language (1.00)
- Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Robots (1.00)
- Vision (0.93)
- Data Science > Data Mining (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Information Technology