FNBench: Benchmarking Robust Federated Learning against Noisy Labels
Jiang, Xuefeng, Li, Jia, Wu, Nannan, Wu, Zhiyuan, Li, Xujing, Sun, Sheng, Xu, Gang, Wang, Yuwei, Li, Qi, Liu, Min
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Robustness to label noise within data is a significant challenge in federated learning (FL). From the data-centric perspective, the data quality of distributed datasets can not be guaranteed since annotations of different clients contain complicated label noise of varying degrees, which causes the performance degradation. There have been some early attempts to tackle noisy labels in FL. However, there exists a lack of benchmark studies on comprehensively evaluating their practical performance under unified settings. To this end, we propose the first benchmark study FNBench to provide an experimental investigation which considers three diverse label noise patterns covering synthetic label noise, imperfect human-annotation errors and systematic errors. Our evaluation incorporates eighteen state-of-the-art methods over five image recognition datasets and one text classification dataset. Meanwhile, we provide observations to understand why noisy labels impair FL, and additionally exploit a representation-aware regularization method to enhance the robustness of existing methods against noisy labels based on our observations. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this work and propose three-fold future directions. To facilitate related communities, our source code is open-sourced at https://github.com/Sprinter1999/FNBench.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
May-13-2025
- Country:
- Africa
- Ethiopia > Addis Ababa
- Addis Ababa (0.04)
- Rwanda > Kigali
- Kigali (0.04)
- Ethiopia > Addis Ababa
- Asia
- China
- Beijing > Beijing (0.05)
- Hong Kong (0.04)
- Hubei Province > Wuhan (0.04)
- Hunan Province > Changsha (0.04)
- Shaanxi Province > Xi'an (0.04)
- Tianjin Province > Tianjin (0.04)
- India > Karnataka
- Bengaluru (0.04)
- Macao (0.04)
- Malaysia > Kuala Lumpur
- Kuala Lumpur (0.04)
- Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- Nepal (0.04)
- South Korea > Seoul
- Seoul (0.04)
- Vietnam > Hanoi
- Hanoi (0.04)
- China
- Europe
- Austria (0.04)
- France > Île-de-France
- Norway > Eastern Norway
- Oslo (0.04)
- Slovenia > Central Slovenia
- Municipality of Ljubljana > Ljubljana (0.04)
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.04)
- Switzerland > Zürich
- Zürich (0.04)
- North America
- Canada
- United States
- California
- Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.14)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Atlanta (0.04)
- Florida > Pinellas County
- St. Petersburg (0.04)
- Utah > Salt Lake County
- Salt Lake City (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Nevada (0.04)
- Idaho > Ada County
- Boise (0.04)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.04)
- California
- Oceania > Australia
- New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- Queensland > Brisbane (0.04)
- South America > Chile
- Africa
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Technology: