Detecting Check-Worthy Claims in Political Debates, Speeches, and Interviews Using Audio Data

A large portion of society united around the same vision and ideas carries enormous energy. That is precisely what political figures would like to accumulate for their cause. With this goal in mind, they can sometimes resort to distorting or hiding the truth, unintentionally or on purpose, which opens the door for misinformation and disinformation. Tools for automatic detection of check-worthy claims would be of great help to moderators of debates, journalists, and fact-checking organizations. While previous work on detecting check-worthy claims has focused on text, here we explore the utility of the audio signal as an additional information source. We create a new multimodal dataset (text and audio in English) containing 48 hours of speech. Our evaluation results show that the audio modality together with text yields improvements over text alone in the case of multiple speakers. Moreover, an audio-only model could outperform a text-only one for a single speaker.