Pre-, In-, and Post-Processing Class Imbalance Mitigation Techniques for Failure Detection in Optical Networks

Ali, Yousuf Moiz, Prilepsky, Jaroslaw E., Sambo, Nicola, Pedro, João, Hosseini, Mohammad M., Napoli, Antonio, Turitsyn, Sergei K., Freire, Pedro

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence 

We compare pre-, in-, and post-processing techniques for class imbalance mitigation in optical network failure detection. Threshold Adjustment achieves the highest F1 gain (15.3%), while Random Under-sampling (RUS) offers the fastest inference, highlighting a key performance-complexity trade-off.

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found