What Do You Mean `Why?': Resolving Sluices in Conversations
Hansen, Victor Petrén Bach, Søgaard, Anders
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
What Do Y ou Mean'Why?': Resolving Sluices in Conversations Victor Petr en Bach Hansen, 1 2 Anders Søgaard 1 3 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 2 Topdanmark A/S, Denmark 3 Google Research, Berlin victor.petren@di.ku.dk, soegaard@di.ku.dk Abstract In conversation, we often ask one-word questions such as'Why?' or'Who?'. Such questions are typically easy for humans to answer, but can be hard for computers, because their resolution requires retrieving both the right semantic frames and the right arguments from context. This paper introduces the novel ellipsis resolution task of resolving such one-word questions, referred to as sluices in linguistics. We present a crowd-sourced dataset containing annotations of sluices from over 4,000 dialogues collected from conversational QA datasets, as well as a series of strong baseline architectures. 1 Introduction Stand-alone wh-word questions, such as When? in Figure 1, are easy for us to understand, but in order to interpret them we need to retrieve implicit information from context. Learning to do so is an instance of sluicing, an ellipsis phenomenon, defined by Ross (1969) as'the effect of deleting everything but the preposed constituent of an embedded question, under the condition that the remainder of the question is identical to some other part of the sentence, or a preceding sentence.' In the context of conversations, one-word wh-word questions are particularly frequent (Anand and Hardt 2016; Rønning, Hardt, and Søgaard 2018), and because they are often hard to resolve, they seem to be a frequent source of error in conversational question answering (Choi et al. 2018; Reddy, Chen, and Manning 2018) and dialogue understanding (Vlachos and Clark 2014). We refer to this type of sluicing as conversational sluicing . Unlike previous work where sluice resolution is treated as predicting the span of the antecedent (Anand and Hardt 2016; Rønning, Hardt, and Søgaard 2018), we frame conversational sluice resolution as a Natural Language Generation (NLG) task, in which we seek to automatically generate the full question, given a question-answer context and a one-word question. Q 1: Where was the bombing?
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Nov-21-2019
- Country:
- North America > United States
- Ohio > Franklin County
- Columbus (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- California > San Diego County
- San Diego (0.04)
- Ohio > Franklin County
- Europe
- United Kingdom > Scotland (0.04)
- Portugal > Lisbon
- Lisbon (0.04)
- Denmark > Capital Region
- Copenhagen (0.24)
- Asia > Japan
- Kyūshū & Okinawa > Kyūshū > Miyazaki Prefecture > Miyazaki (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Technology: