Fairness Aware Counterfactuals for Subgroups
Kavouras, Loukas, Tsopelas, Konstantinos, Giannopoulos, Giorgos, Sacharidis, Dimitris, Psaroudaki, Eleni, Theologitis, Nikolaos, Rontogiannis, Dimitrios, Fotakis, Dimitris, Emiris, Ioannis
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We start with revisiting (and generalizing) existing notions and introducing new, more refined notions of subgroup fairness. We aim to (a) formulate different aspects of the difficulty of individuals in certain subgroups to achieve recourse, i.e. receive the desired outcome, either at the micro level, considering members of the subgroup individually, or at the macro level, considering the subgroup as a whole, and (b) introduce notions of subgroup fairness that are robust, if not totally oblivious, to the cost of achieving recourse. We accompany these notions with an efficient, model-agnostic, highly parameterizable, and explainable framework for evaluating subgroup fairness. We demonstrate the advantages, the wide applicability, and the efficiency of our approach through a thorough experimental evaluation of different benchmark datasets.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-26-2023
- Country:
- Europe (0.93)
- North America > United States
- Texas (0.14)
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Industry:
- Law (0.47)
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety > Crime Prevention & Enforcement (0.70)
- Technology: