Principles to Practices for Responsible AI: Closing the Gap
Schiff, Daniel, Rakova, Bogdana, Ayesh, Aladdin, Fanti, Anat, Lennon, Michael
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Companies have considered adoption of various high-level artificial intelligence (AI) principles for responsible AI, but there is less clarity on how to implement these principles as organizational practices. This paper reviews the principles-to-practices gap. We outline five explanations for this gap ranging from a disciplinary divide to an overabundance of tools. In turn, we argue that an impact assessment framework which is broad, operationalizable, flexible, iterative, guided, and participatory is a promising approach to close the principles-to-practices gap. Finally, to help practitioners with applying these recommendations, we review a case study of AI's use in forest ecosystem restoration, demonstrating how an impact assessment framework can translate into effective and responsible AI practices.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-8-2020
- Country:
- Asia > Middle East
- Israel (0.04)
- Europe
- Finland > Uusimaa
- Helsinki (0.04)
- Germany (0.04)
- Netherlands (0.04)
- Spain > Catalonia
- Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- United Kingdom (0.04)
- Finland > Uusimaa
- North America
- Canada (0.28)
- United States
- California
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Santa Clara County > Mountain View (0.04)
- New York
- Monroe County > Rochester (0.04)
- New York County > New York City (0.05)
- Virginia (0.04)
- California
- Asia > Middle East
- Genre:
- Instructional Material > Course Syllabus & Notes (0.46)
- Overview (1.00)
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Education (1.00)
- Government > Regional Government
- North America Government (0.46)
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Law (1.00)
- Materials > Paper & Forest Products (0.68)
- Social Sector (0.94)
- Technology: