Chain-of-Discussion: A Multi-Model Framework for Complex Evidence-Based Question Answering
Tao, Mingxu, Zhao, Dongyan, Feng, Yansong
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Open-ended question answering requires models to find appropriate evidence to form well-reasoned, comprehensive and helpful answers. In practical applications, models also need to engage in extended discussions on potential scenarios closely relevant to the question. With augmentation of retrieval module, open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce coherent answers often with different focuses, but are still sub-optimal in terms of reliable evidence selection and in-depth question analysis. In this paper, we propose a novel Chain-of-Discussion framework to leverage the synergy among multiple open-source LLMs aiming to provide \textbf{more correct} and \textbf{more comprehensive} answers for open-ended QA, although they are not strong enough individually. Our experiments show that discussions among multiple LLMs play a vital role in enhancing the quality of answers. We release our data and code at \url{https://github.com/kobayashikanna01/Chain-of-Discussion}.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Feb-26-2024
- Country:
- Oceania > Australia
- North America
- United States (0.14)
- Dominican Republic (0.04)
- Canada > Ontario
- Toronto (0.04)
- Asia
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.50)
- Industry:
- Law (0.96)
- Technology: