Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across diverse reasoning and generation tasks, and are increasingly deployed as agents in dynamic environments such as code generation and recommendation systems. However, many real-world applications, such as high-frequency trading and real-time competitive gaming, require decisions under strict latency constraints, where faster responses directly translate into higher rewards. Despite the importance of this latency-quality trade-off, it remains underexplored in the context of LLM-based agents. In this work, we present the first systematic study of this trade-off in realtime decision-making tasks. To support our investigation, we introduce two new benchmarks: HFTBench, a high-frequency trading simulation, and StreetFighter, a competitive gaming platform.

Concept-based models are an emerging paradigm in deep learning that constrains the inference process to operate through human-interpretable variables, facilitating explainability and human interaction. However, these architectures, on par with popular opaque neural models, fail to account for the true causal mechanisms underlying the target phenomena represented in the data. This hampers their ability to support causal reasoning tasks, limits out-of-distribution generalization, and hinders the implementation of fairness constraints. To overcome these issues, we propose Causally reliable Concept Bottleneck Models (C2BMs), a class of concept-based architectures that enforce reasoning through a bottleneck of concepts structured according to a model of the real-world causal mechanisms. We also introduce a pipeline to automatically learn this structure from observational data and unstructured background knowledge (e.g., scientific literature). Experimental evidence suggests that C2BMs are more interpretable, causally reliable, and improve responsiveness to interventions w.r.t.

A full understanding of the behavior of a large language model (LLM) requires our grasp of its input token space. If this space differs from our assumptions, our comprehension of and conclusions about the LLM will likely be flawed.

The rapid advancements in large language models (LLMs), particularly in their reasoning capabilities, hold transformative potential for addressing complex challenges and boosting scientific discovery in atmospheric science. However, leveraging LLMs effectively in this domain requires a robust and comprehensive evaluation benchmark. Toward this end, we present ATMOSSCI-BENCH, a novel benchmark designed to systematically assess LLM performance across five core categories of atmospheric science problems: hydrology, atmospheric dynamics, atmospheric physics, geophysics, and physical oceanography. ATMOSSCI-BENCH features a dual-format design comprising both multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and open-ended questions (OEQs), enabling scalable automated evaluation alongside deeper analysis of conceptual understanding. We employ a template-based MCQ generation framework to create diverse, graduate-level problems with symbolic perturbation, while OEQs are used to probe open-ended reasoning. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of representative LLMs, categorized into four groups: instruction-tuned models, advanced reasoning models, math-augmented models, and domain-specific climate models. Our analysis provides some interesting insights into the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of LLMs in atmospheric science. We believe ATMOSSCI-BENCH can serve as a critical step toward advancing LLM applications in climate services by offering a standard and rigorous evaluation framework.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) fine-tuning has demonstrated significant enhancements in reasoning tasks. However, it often relies on high quality labeled dataset, which is typically difficult to obtain. To address this challenge, we introduce Noise-Aware Dual-Reward Optimization (NaDRO) to effectively enhances the training of Large Language Models (LLMs) under noisy or ambiguous supervision. NaDRO operates through two key components: (1) Preference-based Outcome Reward (POR),which makes a principled bias-variance tradeoff, reducing training variance by learning from robust preference rankings instead of overfitting to single-best estimates; and (2) Context Perception Reward (CPR) mechanism, which ensures that LLMs conduct necessary qualitative assessment of the current problem state to foster deeper situational understanding prior to decision-making.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-risk domains.

Recent advances in retrieval-based in-context learning (ICL) train the retriever using a classification objective, which categorizes in-context examples (ICEs) into the most useful and the rest based on absolute scores. However, during inference, ICEs are retrieved by score ranking rather than classification -- The classification training objective deviates from this test scenario. Hence, in this paper, we propose a novel algorithm that trains a retrieval model by ranking formulation, where the preference rankings between ICEs are given by comparing the likelihood of the LLM generating the correct answer conditioned on each exemplar. By learning to rank, we motivate the retriever to automatically learn diverse rationales why specific examples are more useful for ICL decisions. This addresses the issue that classification models poorly capture broader utility. Experimental results demonstrate the top-1 performance of our proposal across 9 NLP tasks, with ablation studies and case studies further validating the effectiveness of our design.

Misinformation detectors often rely on superficial cues (i.e., shortcuts) that correlate with misinformation in training data but fail to generalize to the diverse and evolving nature of real-world misinformation. This issue is exacerbated by large language models (LLMs), which can easily generate convincing misinformation using simple prompts. We introduce TRUTHOVERTRICKS, a unified evaluation paradigm for measuring shortcut learning in misinformation detection. TRUTHOVERTRICKS categorizes shortcut behaviors into intrinsic shortcut induction and extrinsic shortcut injection, and evaluates seven representative detectors across 14 popular benchmarks, along with two new factual misinformation datasets, NQ-Misinfo and Streaming-Misinfo. Empirical results reveal that existing detectors suffer severe performance degradation when exposed to both naturally occurring and adversarially crafted shortcuts. To address this, we propose the Shortcut Mitigation Framework (SMF), an LLM-augmented data augmentation framework that mitigates shortcut reliance through paraphrasing, factual summarization, and sentiment normalization. SMF consistently enhances robustness across 16 benchmarks, forcing models to rely on deeper semantic understanding rather than shortcut cues.

Table Question Answering (TableQA) combines natural language understanding and structured data reasoning, posing challenges in semantic interpretation and logical inference. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved TableQA performance through Direct Prompting and Agent paradigms. However, these models often rely on spurious correlations, as they tend to overfit to token co-occurrence patterns in pretraining corpora, rather than perform genuine reasoning. To address this issue, we propose Causal Intervention TableQA (CIT), which is based on a structural causal graph and applies front-door adjustment to eliminate bias caused by token co-occurrence. CIT formalizes TableQA as a causal graph and identifies token co-occurrence patterns as confounders. By applying front-door adjustment, CIT guides question variant generation and reasoning to reduce confounding effects. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CIT achieves state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating its effectiveness in mitigating bias. Consistent gains across various LLMs further confirm its generalizability. We release our code here.

Increasing demand for Large Language Models (LLMs) services imposes substantial deployment and computation costs on providers. LLM routing offers a cost-efficient solution by directing queries to the optimal LLM based on model and query features. However, existing works primarily focus on offline scenarios and struggle to adapt to online settings with high query volume and constrained token budgets. In this work, we introduce the first training-free algorithm for online routing scenarios. Our algorithm leverages approximate nearest neighbor search to efficiently estimate query features and performs a one-time optimization over a small set of initial queries to learn a routing strategy that guides future routing. We provide theoretical guarantees demonstrating that our algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of 1 o(1)under natural assumptions, which is further validated by extensive experiments across 3 benchmark datasets and 8 baselines, showing an average improvement of 3.55 in overall performance, 1.85 in cost efficiency, and nearly 4.25 in throughput. Our code is available at https://github.com/fzwark/PORT.