A survey on modern trainable activation functions
Apicella, Andrea, Donnarumma, Francesco, Isgrò, Francesco, Prevete, Roberto
In the literature, there is a strong interest to identify and define activation functions which can improve neural network performance. In recent years there is a renovated interest of the scientific community in investigating activation functions which can be trained during the learning process, usually referred as trainable, learnable or adaptable activation functions. They appear to lead to better network performance. Diverse and heterogeneous models of trainable activation function have been proposed in the literature. In this paper, we present a survey of these models. Starting from a discussion on the use of the term "activation function" in literature, we propose a taxonomy of trainable activation functions, highlight common and distinctive proprieties of recent and past models, and discuss on main advantages and limitations of this type of approach. We show that many of the proposed approaches are equivalent to add neuron layers which use fixed activation functions (nontrainable activation functions) and some simple local rule constrains the corresponding weight layers.
May-2-2020
- Country:
- North America
- United States
- New York (0.04)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- California
- Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Puerto Rico > San Juan
- San Juan (0.04)
- Canada
- Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District
- Vancouver (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Italy > Campania (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- North Yorkshire > York (0.04)
- France > Hauts-de-France
- Asia > Japan
- Honshū > Chūbu > Aichi Prefecture > Nagoya (0.04)
- North America
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Overview (0.86)
- Technology: