AI Favors Autocracy, But Democracies Can Still Fight Back
As Ben Buchanan and Andrew Imbrie note in their recent book, "AI's [artificial intelligence's] new capabilities are both marvels and distractions." The marvel versus distraction dichotomy is an interesting one: due to the two possible natures of AI, the question of whether advances in AI will favor autocracies or democracies has come to the forefront of the tech and global power debate. On the one hand, AI has the potential to tackle some of the world's most challenging social problems, such as issues related to healthcare, the environment, and crisis response, leading some to believe that democracies will wield AI to create a future for human good. On the other hand, some fear AI-enabled surveillance, information campaigns, and cyber operations will empower existing tyrants and produce new ones, leading to a future where autocracies thrive and democracies struggle. By examining how advances in AI capabilities in the near future could benefit autocracies and democracies, as well as how these advances could benefit both, I believe that AI is likely to favor autocracies in the near term, but under one necessary condition: that democracies are negligent in their response to autocracies' destructive use of AI.
Jun-29-2022, 21:02:09 GMT
- Country:
- Africa > Uganda (0.05)
- Asia
- China > Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (0.05)
- Laos (0.05)
- Mongolia (0.05)
- Uzbekistan (0.05)
- Industry:
- Government (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Technology: