Automatic Identification of Conceptual Metaphors With Limited Knowledge

Gandy, Lisa (Central Michigan University) | Allan, Nadji (Center for Advanced Defense Studies) | Atallah, Mark (Center for Advanced Defense Studies) | Frieder, Ophir (Georgetown University) | Howard, Newton (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Kanareykin, Sergey ( Brain Sciences Foundation ) | Koppel, Moshe (Bar-Ilan University) | Last, Mark (Ben Gurion University) | Neuman, Yair (Ben Gurion University) | Argamon, Shlomo (Illinois Institute of Technology)

AAAI Conferences 

Full natural language understanding requires identifying and analyzing the meanings of metaphors, which are ubiquitous in both text and speech. Over the last thirty years, linguistic metaphors have been shown to be based on more general conceptual metaphors, partial semantic mappings between disparate conceptual domains. Though some achievements have been made in identifying linguistic metaphors over the last decade or so, little work has been done to date on automatically identifying conceptual metaphors. This paper describes research on identifying conceptual metaphors based on corpus data. Our method uses as little background knowledge as possible, to ease transfer to new languages and to mini- mize any bias introduced by the knowledge base construction process. The method relies on general heuristics for identifying linguistic metaphors and statistical clustering (guided by Wordnet) to form conceptual metaphor candidates. Human experiments show the system effectively finds meaningful conceptual metaphors.

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found