Follow this section to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW? Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens. Follow this tag to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW?

We sat down with Douglas Guillbault to discuss his paper, " Comparing Colorseeing, Colorblind, Painters, and Large Language Models in Their Processing of Color Metaphors ". The results have interesting implications for how we model human cognition, and in turn, how the concept of synaesthesia could be integrated to develop more intelligent AI models. A color metaphor is the use of color to describe something in a way that is not immediately literal. For example, to say "green with envy" would be a color metaphor, because envy doesn't have an immediate visual structure to it - we're evoking a broader, more flexible notion of what green conveys, beyond just its visible properties. What makes metaphors very interesting is that they often use past experience or cultural associations in new ways to talk about something beyond our current perception - either something imagined or in the future, which are many steps of abstraction away from the present. Metaphors provide an alternative pathway to get there.

Large language models don't "learn"--they copy. And that could change everything for the tech industry. O n Tuesday, researchers at Stanford and Yale revealed something that AI companies would prefer to keep hidden. Four popular large language models--OpenAI's GPT, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini, and xAI's Grok--have stored large portions of some of the books they've been trained on, and can reproduce long excerpts from those books. In fact, when prompted strategically by researchers, Claude delivered the near-complete text of,,, and, in addition to thousands of words from books including and .

The ideas presented in George Lakoff and Srini Narayanan's The Neural Mind are fascinating, but the writing is far less compelling This is a book review in two parts. The first is about the ideas presented in The Neural Mind: How brains think, which are fascinating. The second is about the actual experience of reading it. The book tackles one of the biggest questions in neuroscience: how do neurons perform all the different kinds of human thought possible, from planning motor actions to composing sentences and musing about philosophy? The authors have very different perspectives.

Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent every weekday. The United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is well known for getting their point across on social media. A seven-minute montage of mannequins succumbing to 4th of July firework injuries may be an unconventional way to warn about the dangers of recreational explosives--but try forgetting those images when lighting your next bottle rocket. In similar pyrotechnic fashion, the CPSC is warning everyone to take extra care during the holidays when it comes to all kinds of combustible, seasonally appropriate objects. On December 22, the commission illustrated how some gifts are far more flammable than others with its 30-minute Escooter Lithium-Ion Battery Yule Log video.

'Learning with AI' is an open-source book from the University of Leeds . We spoke with Chrissi Nerantzi, part of the project team about their choice to use Ariyana Ahmad's illustration'AI is Everywhere' for the cover of the book. For the team, the choice of cover was about more than just visual aesthetic. Collages can capture multiple perspectives, textures, and approaches, much like the student voices incorporated throughout the book. Ahmad's illustration, while not a collage, achieves a similar effect.

From 10th to 12th September 2025, Barcelona hosted an academic gathering at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya: the first Hype Studies Conference, titled "(Don't) Believe the Hype!?" Organised by a transnational, collective research group of scholars and practitioners, the conference drew together researchers, activists, artists, journalists, and technology professionals to examine hype as a significant force shaping contemporary society. Hype Studies is an emerging academic field that analyses how and why excessive expectations form around technologies, ideas, or phenomena, and what effects those expectations have on society, culture, economics, and policy. As the playful brackets around "Don't" in the conference title suggest - both a warning and an invitation to question that warning - the aim of the conference wasn't to simply reject hype, but to understand it. The conference approached hype critically by examining it as a phenomenon with real power and consequences that needs to be understood and questioned. The purpose here was to build collective knowledge about hype, develop better and more concrete theories, share empirical findings, and create an interdisciplinary community whilst advancing the field's scholarship and knowledge.

Metaphors and metaphorical language (MLs) play an important role in healthcare communication between clinicians, patients, and patients' family members. In this work, we focus on Dutch language data from cancer patients. We extract metaphors used by patients using two data sources: (1) cancer patient storytelling interview data and (2) online forum data, including patients' posts, comments, and questions to professionals. We investigate how current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) perform on this task by exploring different prompting strategies such as chain of thought reasoning, few-shot learning, and self-prompting. With a human-in-the-loop setup, we verify the extracted metaphors and compile the outputs into a corpus named HealthQuote.NL. We believe the extracted metaphors can support better patient care, for example shared decision making, improved communication between patients and clinicians, and enhanced patient health literacy. They can also inform the design of personalized care pathways. We share prompts and related resources at https://github.com/aaronlifenghan/HealthQuote.NL

Language models are increasingly tested on multilingual creativity, demanding culturally grounded, abstract generations. Standard prompting methods often produce repetitive or shallow outputs. We introduce Adaptive Originality Filtering (AOF), a prompting strategy that enforces novelty and cultural fidelity via semantic rejection. To assess quality, we propose RiddleScore, a metric combining novelty, diversity, fluency, and answer alignment. AOF improves Distinct-2 (0.915 in Japanese), reduces Self-BLEU (0.177), and raises RiddleScore (up to +57.1% in Arabic). Human evaluations confirm fluency, creativity, and cultural fit gains. However, improvements vary: Arabic shows greater RiddleScore gains than Distinct-2; Japanese sees similar changes. Though focused on riddles, our method may apply to broader creative tasks. Overall, semantic filtering with composite evaluation offers a lightweight path to culturally rich generation without fine-tuning.

Metaphor analysis is a complex linguistic phenomenon shaped by context and external factors. While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate advanced capabilities in knowledge integration, contextual reasoning, and creative generation, their mechanisms for metaphor comprehension remain insufficiently explored. This study examines LLMs' metaphor-processing abilities from three perspectives: (1) Concept Mapping: using embedding space projections to evaluate how LLMs map concepts in target domains (e.g., misinterpreting "fall in love" as "drop down from love"); (2) Metaphor-Literal Repository: analyzing metaphorical words and their literal counterparts to identify inherent metaphorical knowledge; and (3) Syntactic Sensitivity: assessing how metaphorical syntactic structures influence LLMs' performance. Our findings reveal that LLMs generate 15\%-25\% conceptually irrelevant interpretations, depend on metaphorical indicators in training data rather than contextual cues, and are more sensitive to syntactic irregularities than to structural comprehension. These insights underline the limitations of LLMs in metaphor analysis and call for more robust computational approaches.