In this section, we present detailed proofs for the theoretical derivation of Thm. 1, which aims to solvethefollowingoptimizationproblem: min
–Neural Information Processing Systems
These assumptions are not strong and can be satisfied in most of environments includes MuJoCo, Atarigamesandsoon. Let f be an Lebesgue integrable function, P and Q are two probability distributions, |f| C,then EP(x)f(x) EQ(x)f(x) CDTV(P,Q) (5) Proof. Suppose there are two actions a1, a2 under state s, and let Q1(s,a1) = u, Q1(s,a2) = v. In this way, we can derive the upper bound of Ea π2Q1(s,a) Ea π1Q1(s,a)asabove. Since both sides of the above equation have the same minimum (here the minima are given by Qk = Q), we can replace the objective in Problem 2 with the upper bound in Eq. (10) and solve therelaxedoptimizationproblem.
Neural Information Processing Systems
Feb-9-2026, 23:15:29 GMT
- Country:
- Asia > Japan
- Honshū > Kansai > Osaka Prefecture > Osaka (0.04)
- Europe > France
- Hauts-de-France > Nord > Lille (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia
- New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- Asia > Japan
- Technology: