The Mimicry Game: Towards Self-recognition in Chatbots
Oktar, Yigit, Okur, Erdem, Turkan, Mehmet
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
In standard Turing test, a machine has to prove its humanness to the judges. By successfully imitating a thinking entity such as a human, this machine then proves that it can also think. However, many objections are raised against the validity of this argument. Such objections claim that Turing test is not a tool to demonstrate existence of general intelligence or thinking activity. In this light, alternatives to Turing test are to be investigated. Self-recognition tests applied on animals through mirrors appear to be a viable alternative to demonstrate the existence of a type of general intelligence. Methodology here constructs a textual version of the mirror test by placing the chatbot (in this context) as the one and only judge to figure out whether the contacted one is an other, a mimicker, or oneself in an unsupervised manner. This textual version of the mirror test is objective, self-contained, and is mostly immune to objections raised against the Turing test. Any chatbot passing this textual mirror test should have or acquire a thought mechanism that can be referred to as the inner-voice, answering the original and long lasting question of Turing "Can machines think?" in a constructive manner.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Feb-6-2020
- Country:
- Asia > Middle East
- Republic of Türkiye > İzmir Province > İzmir (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- New York > Broome County
- Binghamton (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine (0.30)
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Cognitive Science (1.00)
- Issues > Turing's Test (1.00)
- Natural Language > Chatbot (0.92)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence