intelligence


Which Employees Do We Need In The Future? Not Only The Masterminds

#artificialintelligence

Claudio Fernández-Aráoz, senior edviser at Egon Zehnder International, analyzed cases where seemingly outstanding hires for C-level positions ended up being let go. His conclusion: they were hired for their business expertise and intelligence but fired for lapses in emotional intelligence. Some of the main questions companies (and HR departments especially) need to address are: Which employees do we need to retain? Who can lead us to excellence? These questions can only be answered based on high levels of uncertainty – which we must reduce as much as possible.


Why We Should Stop Conflating Human and Machine Intelligence

#artificialintelligence

It's common to hear phrases like'machine learning' and'artificial intelligence' and believe that somehow, someone has managed to replicate a human mind inside a computer. This, of course, is untrue--but part of the reason this idea is so pervasive is because the metaphor of human learning and intelligence has been quite useful in explaining machine learning and artificial intelligence. Indeed, some AI researchers maintain a close link with the neuroscience community, and inspiration runs in both directions. But the metaphor can be a hindrance to people trying to explain machine learning to those less familiar with it. One of the biggest risks of conflating human and machine intelligence is that we start to hand over too much agency to machines.


Bankers of the future will have to be both engineers and economists

#artificialintelligence

The banking industry is becoming a digital rather than a physical system. So what sort of leaders should be running a modern bank? Should they be accountants or engineers -- or both? When I was completing a PhD in artificial intelligence (AI) at the University of Cambridge 20 years ago, many of my engineering classmates went to work for banks, and some of them run large Wall Street financial companies. The fourth industrial revolution is shrinking the world of work at a rapid rate.


Artificial Intelligence is Upon Us -- Are We Ready? – Intercepting Horizons – Medium

#artificialintelligence

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is getting a lot of attention these days, particularly in the technology industry and in corporate boardrooms. AI is also becoming prevalent in consumers everyday lives. Consumers don't always recognize it as such, as corporate marketing experts prefer to avoid technical jargon and instead use consumer friendly names like Siri and Alexa -- but for people that are more technically inclined, the ubiquitous presence of AI is hard to miss. AI is not a new concept. In fact, its roots go back several decades. Is this just another technology hype that is going to fade, or does it truly have the potential to bring about transformations, either good or bad, of epic proportions? Let's take a look at how we got here and why AI is suddenly capturing so much attention.


Black Box Human Or Black Box AI? A Talk With Kim Larsen, Deutsche Telekom

#artificialintelligence

Will black box AI fly?Andy Kelly on Unsplash enhanced by CogWorld With current advances in technology and Artificial Intelligence, most major companies are going to great lengths to attract the right talent and showcase their expertise in the field. Today having a futurist among its top rank management is not an eccentric fad, but a competitive necessity. Google is well-known for its collaboration with Ray Kurzweil. While we all know about the AI conquests of IBM, Amazon and Google, less is being revealed about machine learning projects in the "traditional" industry of telecom operators. Coming from a telecommunications background, I thought the balance should be restored.


US Defense Intelligence Warns of AI-human Hybrid Soldiers From China - The Sociable

#artificialintelligence

China is moving towards merging AI with humans, and the United States Defense Intelligence Agency sees this as a major concern for the future of warfare. Lt. General Ashley begins his talk at 32:20 in the above video by the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service Speaking at the Association of the United States Army annual meeting on October 8, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Director Lieutenant General Robert P. Ashley, Jr. said that one of the biggest decisions that the United States military will have to make is how to deal with the "integration of humans and machines" that China is pursuing. "China is progressively pursuing a 2025 strategy where they want to be the main driver of AI, not only for their economic but for their industrial transformation," said Ashley. "Whoever leads in AI will rule the world." "The character of war is constantly changing, and we see AI as we see some of these disruptive technologies that continue to change the character of war -- the complexity and the speed of human interaction. Our task is to understand how they operate," said the DIA director.


The State of Artificial Intelligence in 2018: A Good Old Fashioned Re…

#artificialintelligence

Sunny Mishra, RPA CoE - Consulting Architect at ExxonMobil at ExxonMobil Great deck, but I have some minor issues. As a universal law, we cannot teach machines more intelligence than what we have at this point in time. So, instead of calling "Artificial Intelligence", we should drop the word "Artificial" and the word "Intelligence". I do not believe that there is any "artificiality" to any intelligence. First of all, Intelligence is gained/learned from us following "Rules" and Data" that we have associated with since we are born. This learning process dictates our outcome and that is fixed. There is no such thing as "Gut Feeling". It does not exist....me simply make it up to make any point heard across. So no matter how big or complex machines we build, it will only learn to behave by the "Rules" and the associated "Data", which always has a "fixed" outcome or result, same as ours. By laws of universe, without evolving, we would have remained as cave dwellers. So, every day of our life, we observe new rules and results which evolves us to the next level. But, If for example, I am locked up in a dark room, isolated from observing any new rules or data or results, I will be at the same level of intelligence as the day I get locked in. Similarly, if we cannot generate any new intelligence in isolation, we cannot feed the robots any new rules and hence they will remain at a certain level of intelligence for ever. What I am trying to say here is "...AI will never be more intelligent than its creator...". 3 months ago Reply Are you sure you want to Yes No Your message goes here Great deck, but I have some minor issues. As a universal law, we cannot teach machines more intelligence than what we have at this point in time. So, instead of calling "Artificial Intelligence", we should drop the word "Artificial" and the word "Intelligence". I do not believe that there is any "artificiality" to any intelligence. First of all, Intelligence is gained/learned from us following "Rules" and Data" that we have associated with since we are born.


Three Cognitive Dimensions for Tracking Deep Learning Progress

#artificialintelligence

Early I brought up Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. That is, humans exhibit strengths in different kinds of intelligences. Specifically these are interpersonal, intrapersonal, verbal, logical, spatial, rhythmic, naturalistic and kinaesthetic intelligence. Clearly there are many kinds of ways of thinking, each with their own strengths. Therefore, one may ask if we can use this notion of multiple intelligences to explore the different ways that AGI research may evolve.


will.i.am on arifticial intelligence and data independence

#artificialintelligence

"I am not my social security number, I am not my drivers' licence, I am not my passport. I am who I know, where I go, where I have been, that is who I am," he recently said at an AI summit, "This AI Life." "I own my blood," he explains, "not the hospital I was born in. The doctors that help me being born do not own my DNA? This is the difference between the dark ages and the age we are in now. My digital DNA is called data.


Making AI more human – ushering in the cognitive era of analytics

#artificialintelligence

As we heard recently ahead of this year's British Science Festival, widespread acceptance of automated technologies could be held back due to public fear. Even Prince Charles has been vocal about his concerns of a world dominated by machines. Despite this scepticism, in the business world, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just futuristic. Although it is still emerging, it is already enabling companies to rapidly change work processes to make them more fluid, or completely reimagine them altogether. To move past the speculation and amplify human work in a tangible way, businesses must put human intuition in the middle of data analytics and advanced algorithms – we call this'augmented intelligence.'