MultimodalHugs: Enabling Sign Language Processing in Hugging Face
Sant, Gerard, Jiang, Zifan, Escolano, Carlos, Moryossef, Amit, Müller, Mathias, Sennrich, Rico, Ebling, Sarah
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
In recent years, sign language processing (SLP) has gained importance in the general field of Natural Language Processing. However, compared to research on spoken languages, SLP research is hindered by complex ad-hoc code, inadvertently leading to low reproducibility and unfair comparisons. Existing tools that are built for fast and reproducible experimentation, such as Hugging Face, are not flexible enough to seamlessly integrate sign language experiments. This view is confirmed by a survey we conducted among SLP researchers. To address these challenges, we introduce MultimodalHugs, a framework built on top of Hugging Face that enables more diverse data modalities and tasks, while inheriting the well-known advantages of the Hugging Face ecosystem. Even though sign languages are our primary focus, MultimodalHugs adds a layer of abstraction that makes it more widely applicable to other use cases that do not fit one of the standard templates of Hugging Face. We provide quantitative experiments to illustrate how MultimodalHugs can accommodate diverse modalities such as pose estimation data for sign languages, or pixel data for text characters.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-15-2025
- Country:
- Africa > Rwanda
- Asia
- China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- Middle East
- Jordan (0.04)
- Republic of Türkiye > Gaziantep Province
- Gaziantep (0.04)
- UAE > Abu Dhabi Emirate
- Abu Dhabi (0.14)
- Yemen > Amran Governorate
- Amran (0.04)
- Thailand > Bangkok
- Bangkok (0.04)
- Europe
- Bulgaria (0.04)
- France > Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Bouches-du-Rhône > Marseille (0.04)
- Germany > Saxony
- Leipzig (0.04)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- Portugal > Lisbon
- Lisbon (0.04)
- Spain (0.04)
- Switzerland > Zürich
- Zürich (0.04)
- United Kingdom > Scotland (0.04)
- North America
- Canada
- Nova Scotia (0.04)
- Ontario > Toronto (0.04)
- United States
- California > Los Angeles County
- Los Angeles (0.14)
- Florida > Miami-Dade County
- Miami (0.04)
- Minnesota > Hennepin County
- Minneapolis (0.14)
- Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County
- Philadelphia (0.04)
- Texas
- Chambers County (0.04)
- Kleberg County (0.04)
- Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- California > Los Angeles County
- Canada
- Genre:
- Questionnaire & Opinion Survey (1.00)
- Research Report (0.82)
- Workflow (0.68)
- Industry:
- Education > Curriculum > Subject-Specific Education (1.00)
- Technology: