B-PL-PINN: Stabilizing PINN Training with Bayesian Pseudo Labeling
Innerebner, Kevin, Rohrhofer, Franz M., Geiger, Bernhard C.
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Training physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for forward problems often suffers from severe convergence issues, hindering the propagation of information from regions where the desired solution is well-defined. Haitsiukevich and Ilin (2023) proposed an ensemble approach that extends the active training domain of each PINN based on i) ensemble consensus and ii) vicinity to (pseudo-)labeled points, thus ensuring that the information from the initial condition successfully propagates to the interior of the computational domain. In this work, we suggest replacing the ensemble by a Bayesian PINN, and consensus by an evaluation of the PINN's posterior variance. Our experiments show that this mathematically principled approach outperforms the ensemble on a set of benchmark problems and is competitive with PINN ensembles trained with combinations of Adam and LBFGS.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jul-3-2025
- Country:
- Europe
- North America
- Canada > British Columbia
- Vancouver (0.04)
- United States
- Alaska > Anchorage Municipality
- Anchorage (0.04)
- California
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Santa Clara County > Stanford (0.04)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- Alaska > Anchorage Municipality
- Canada > British Columbia
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.51)