Fairness in Large Language Models in Three Hours
Viet, Thang Doan, Wang, Zichong, Nguyen, Minh Nhat, Zhang, Wenbin
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
For example, one line of work extends traditional fairness in LLMs involves unique backgrounds, taxonomies, and fairness notions--individual fairness and group fairness--to these fulfillment techniques. This tutorial provides a systematic overview models[6]. Specifically, individual fairness seeks to ensure similar of recent advances in the literature concerning fair LLMs, beginning outcomes for similar individuals [13, 49], while group fairness focuses with real-world case studies to introduce LLMs, followed by on equalizing outcome statistics across subgroups defined by an analysis of bias causes therein. The concept of fairness in LLMs sensitive attributes [18, 44-46] (e.g., gender or race). While these is then explored, summarizing the strategies for evaluating bias classification-based fairness notions are adept at evaluating bias in and the algorithms designed to promote fairness. Additionally, resources LLM's classification results[6], they fall short in addressing biases for assessing bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, that arise during the LLM generation process[20].
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Aug-7-2024
- Country:
- Europe > Spain (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Idaho > Ada County
- Boise (0.05)
- Florida > Miami-Dade County
- Miami (0.05)
- Idaho > Ada County
- Asia > Vietnam
- Genre:
- Technology: