The strategy of conflict and cooperation
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
This paper introduces a unified framework called cooperative extensive form games, which (i) generalizes standard non-cooperative games, and (ii) allows for more complex coalition formation dynamics than previous concepts like coalition-proof Nash equilibrium. Central to this framework is a novel solution concept called cooperative equilibrium system (CES). CES differs from Nash equilibrium in two important respects. First, a CES is immune to both unilateral and multilateral `credible' deviations. Second, unlike Nash equilibrium, whose stability relies on the assumption that the strategies of non-deviating players are held fixed, CES allows for the possibility that players may regroup and adjust their strategies in response to a deviation. The main result establishes that every cooperative extensive form game, possibly with imperfect information, possesses a CES. For games with perfect information, the proof is constructive. This framework is broadly applicable in contexts such as oligopolistic markets and dynamic political bargaining.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-25-2023
- Country:
- Europe
- France > Île-de-France
- Hungary > Budapest
- Budapest (0.04)
- Netherlands > Limburg
- Maastricht (0.04)
- Norway > Norwegian Sea (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- North America > United States
- California > Los Angeles County
- Pasadena (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- Michigan (0.04)
- California > Los Angeles County
- Europe
- Genre:
- Overview (0.67)
- Research Report (0.84)
- Industry:
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games (1.00)
- Technology: