A Survey on The Expressive Power of Graph Neural Networks
Comprehensive surveys on GNNs were provided by Hamilton et al. (2017a), Zhou et al. (2018), and Wu et al. (2019). Despite GNNs' empirical successes in various fields, Xu et al. (2019) and Morris et al. (2019) demonstrated that GNNs cannot distinguish some pairs of graphs. This indicates that GNNs cannot correctly classify these graphs with any parameters unless the labels of these graphs are the same. This result contrasts with the universal approximation power of multi layer perceptrons (Cybenko, 1989; Hornik et al., 1989; Hornik, 1991). Furthermore, Sato et al. (2019a) showed that GNNs are at most as powerful as distributed local algorithms (Angluin, 1980; Suomela, 2013). Thus there are many combinatorial problems that GNNs cannot solve other than the graph isomorphism problem. Consequently, various provably powerful GNN models have been proposed to overcome the limitations of GNNs. This survey provides an extensive overview of the expressive power of GNNs and various GNN models to overcome these limitations.
Mar-14-2020
- Country:
- North America > United States
- Virginia (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom
- England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia
- Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region
- Dawei (0.04)
- Japan > Honshū
- Kansai > Kyoto Prefecture > Kyoto (0.04)
- Myanmar > Tanintharyi Region
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Overview (1.00)
- Technology: