Benchmarking a Catchment-Aware Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM) for Large-Scale Hydrological Modeling
Kratzert, Frederik, Klotz, Daniel, Shalev, Guy, Klambauer, Günter, Hochreiter, Sepp, Nearing, Grey
Regional rainfall-runoff modeling is an old but still mostly outstanding problem in Hydrological Sciences. The problem currently is that traditional hydrological models degrade significantly in performance when calibrated for multiple basins together instead of for a single basin alone. In this paper, we propose a novel, data-driven approach using Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs), and demonstrate that under a'big data' paradigm, this is not necessarily the case. By training a single LSTM model on 531 basins from the CAMELS data set using meteorological time series data and static catchment attributes, we were able to significantly improve performance compared to a set of several different hydrological benchmark models. Our proposed approach not only significantly outperforms hydrological models that were calibrated regionally but also achieves better performance than hydrological models that were calibrated for each basin individually. Furthermore, we propose an adaption to the standard LSTM architecture, which we call an Entity-A ware-LSTM (EA-LSTM), that allows for learning, and embedding as a feature layer in a deep learning model, catchment similarities. We show that this learned catchment similarity corresponds well with what we would expect from prior hydrological understanding. 1 Introduction A longstanding problem in the Hydrological Sciences is about how to use one model, or one set of models, to provide spatially continuous hydrological simulations across large areas (e.g., regional, continental, global). This is the so-called regional modeling problem, and the central challenge is about how to extrapolate hydrologic information from one area to another - e.g., from gauged to ungauged watersheds, from instrumented to non-instrumented hillslopes, from areas with flux towers to areas without, etc. (Blöschl and Sivapalan, 1995). Often this is done using ancillary data (e.g.
Jul-19-2019
- Country:
- Europe
- Austria > Upper Austria
- Linz (0.04)
- Czechia (0.04)
- Netherlands > North Holland
- Amsterdam (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Austria > Upper Austria
- North America
- Canada > Rocky Mountains (0.04)
- United States
- Alabama > Tuscaloosa County
- Tuscaloosa (0.14)
- California (0.04)
- Colorado > Boulder County
- Boulder (0.04)
- New Mexico (0.04)
- Rocky Mountains (0.04)
- Alabama > Tuscaloosa County
- Europe
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Industry:
- Technology: