YESciEval: Robust LLM-as-a-Judge for Scientific Question Answering
D'Souza, Jennifer, Giglou, Hamed Babaei, Münch, Quentin
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Large Language Models (LLMs) drive scientific question-answering on modern search engines, yet their evaluation robustness remains underexplored. We introduce YESciEval, an open-source framework that combines fine-grained rubric-based assessment with reinforcement learning to mitigate optimism bias in LLM evaluators. We release multidisciplinary scienceQ&A datasets, including adversarial variants, with evaluation scores from multiple LLMs. Independent of proprietary models and human feedback, our approach enables scalable, cost-free evaluation. By advancing reliable LLM-as-a-judge models, this work supports AI alignment and fosters robust, transparent evaluation essential for scientific inquiry.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
May-30-2025
- Country:
- Europe (1.00)
- Asia (0.67)
- North America > United States
- Minnesota (0.27)
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.94)
- Industry:
- Leisure & Entertainment > Sports (0.93)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.67)
- Education > Curriculum
- Subject-Specific Education (0.45)
- Technology: