Architecting Safer Autonomous Aviation Systems
Fenn, Jane, Nicholson, Mark, Pai, Ganesh, Wilkinson, Michael
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
The aviation literature gives relatively little guidance to practitioners about the specifics of architecting systems for safety, particularly the impact of architecture on allocating safety requirements, or the relative ease of system assurance resulting from system or subsystem level architectural choices. As an exemplar, this paper considers common architectural patterns used within traditional aviation systems and explores their safety and safety assurance implications when applied in the context of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based functionality. Considering safety as an architectural property, we discuss both the allocation of safety requirements and the architectural trade-offs involved early in the design lifecycle. This approach could be extended to other assured properties, similar to safety, such as security. We conclude with a discussion of the safety considerations that emerge in the context of candidate architectural patterns that have been proposed in the recent literature for enabling autonomy capabilities by integrating AI and ML. A recommendation is made for the generation of a property-driven architectural pattern catalogue.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jan-9-2023
- Country:
- North America > United States
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- Pennsylvania > Allegheny County
- Pittsburgh (0.04)
- California
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Los Angeles County > Torrance (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom
- England > North Yorkshire > York (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.82)
- Instructional Material (0.67)
- Industry:
- Technology: