Developing Pedagogically-Guided Threshold Algorithms for Intelligent Automated Essay Feedback
Roscoe, Rod D. (Arizona State University) | Kugler, Danica (Arizona State University) | Crossley, Scott A. (Georgia State University) | Weston, Jennifer L. (Arizona State University) | McNamara, Danielle S. (Arizona State University)
Grimes and Warschauer (2010) describe two accuracy (Warschauer & Ware, 2006), there have been kinds of systems: automated essay scoring (AES) and relatively few evaluations of student improvement (e.g., automated writing evaluation (AWE). AES systems strive Kellogg, Whiteford, & Quinlan, 2010) or the role of to assign accurate and reliable scores to essays or specific feedback (e.g., Roscoe, Varner, Cai, Weston, Crossley, & writing features (e.g., mechanics). Scores are generated McNamara, 2011). Hence, in this paper, we explore and using various artificial intelligence (AI) methods, including describe a method for developing pedagogically-guided statistical modeling, natural language processing (NLP), algorithms that guide formative feedback in an intelligent and Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) (Shermis & Burstein, tutor system (ITS) for writing.
May-20-2012
- Country:
- Oceania > New Zealand
- North Island > Auckland Region > Auckland (0.04)
- North America > United States
- New Jersey > Bergen County
- Mahwah (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Suffolk County
- Boston (0.04)
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Atlanta (0.04)
- California
- San Mateo County > Menlo Park (0.04)
- San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Arizona > Maricopa County
- Tempe (0.04)
- New Jersey > Bergen County
- Oceania > New Zealand
- Industry:
- Technology: