Apollo-MILP: An Alternating Prediction-Correction Neural Solving Framework for Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
Liu, Haoyang, Wang, Jie, Geng, Zijie, Li, Xijun, Zong, Yuxuan, Zhu, Fangzhou, Hao, Jianye, Wu, Feng
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Leveraging machine learning (ML) to predict an initial solution for mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) has gained considerable popularity in recent years. These methods predict a solution and fix a subset of variables to reduce the problem dimension. Then, they solve the reduced problem to obtain the final solutions. However, directly fixing variable values can lead to low-quality solutions or even infeasible reduced problems if the predicted solution is not accurate enough. To address this challenge, we propose an A lternating p redictio n-correction neural sol ving framewo rk (Apollo-MILP) that can identify and select accurate and reliable predicted values to fix. In each iteration, Apollo-MILP conducts a prediction step for the unfixed variables, followed by a correction step to obtain an improved solution (called reference solution) through a trust-region search. By incorporating the predicted and reference solutions, we introduce a novel U ncertainty-based E rror upper BO und (UEBO) to evaluate the uncertainty of the predicted values and fix those with high confidence. A notable feature of Apollo-MILP is the superior ability for problem reduction while preserving optimality, leading to high-quality final solutions. Experiments on commonly used benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed Apollo-MILP significantly outperforms other ML-based approaches in terms of solution quality, achieving over a 50% reduction in the solution gap. Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) is one of the most fundamental models for combinatorial optimization with broad applications in operations research (Bixby et al., 2004), engineering (Ma et al., 2019), and daily scheduling or planning (Li et al., 2024b). However, solving large-size MILPs remains time-consuming and computationally expensive, as many are NP-hard and have exponential expansion of search spaces as instance sizes grow. To mitigate this challenge, researchers have explored a wide suite of machine learning (ML) methods (Gasse et al., 2022). In practice, MILP instances from the same scenario often share similar patterns and structures, which ML models can capture to achieve improved performance (Bengio et al., 2021). Recently, extensive research has focused on using ML models to predict solutions for MILPs. Notable approaches include Neural Diving (ND) (Nair et al., 2020; Y oon, 2021; Paulus & Krause, 2023) and Predict-and-Search (PS) (Han et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2024), as illustrated in Figure 1. Given a MILP instance, ND and PS begin by employing an ML model to predict an initial solution. ND with SelectiveNet (Nair et al., 2020) assigns fixed values to a subset of variables based on the prediction, thereby constructing a reduced MILP problem with a reduced dimensionality of decision variables. Then, ND solves the reduced problem to obtain the final solutions.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Mar-2-2025
- Country:
- Asia > China (0.28)
- North America > United States
- Maryland (0.14)
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Technology: