The Uncertainty of Machine Learning Predictions in Asset Pricing

Recently, machine learning (ML) models have gained prominence in predicting asset returns, selecting portfolios, and estimating stochastic discount factors, with significant success in these areas. ML techniques, by capturing complex and nonlinear relationships in financial data, are particularly well-suited for enhancing portfolio management decisions. For example, within the mean-variance portfolio framework, ML methods are increasingly used to estimate expected returns and (co)variances, often leading to more effective portfolio allocations. The literature consistently demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning in these and other applications (e.g., Gu, Kelly, and Xiu (2020); Bianchi, B uchner, and Tamoni (2021); Cong, Tang, Wang, and Zhang (2021); Kelly, Malamud, and Zhou (2021); Patton and Weller (2022); Didisheim, Ke, Kelly, and Malamud (2023); Filipovic and Schneider (2024)). Despite the success of machine learning in asset pricing, existing literature typically treats ML predictions as point estimates and conducts asset pricing analyses as if they were true values, overlooking the associated uncertainty. This is surprising, given that uncertainty about input parameters is widely acknowledged as critical in portfolio selection (e.g., DeMiguel, Garlappi, and Uppal (2009)), and Garlappi, Uppal, and Wang (2007) show that incorporating forecast uncertainty in mean-variance portfolio allocation leads to distinct economic insights. However, quantifying prediction uncertainty in ML forecasts, particularly with neural networks, remains a complex challenge, limiting their broader application in asset pricing.