Facets of Disparate Impact: Evaluating Legally Consistent Bias in Machine Learning
Briscoe, Jarren, Gebremedhin, Assefaw
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Leveraging current legal standards, we define bias through the lens of marginal benefits and objective testing with the novel metric "Objective Fairness Index". This index combines the contextual nuances of objective testing with metric stability, providing a legally consistent and reliable measure. Utilizing the Objective Fairness Index, we provide fresh insights into sensitive machine learning applications, such as COMPAS (recidivism prediction), highlighting the metric's practical and theoretical significance. The Objective Fairness Index allows one to differentiate between discriminatory tests and systemic disparities.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
May-9-2025
- Country:
- Africa > South Africa (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East
- Republic of Türkiye (0.04)
- Europe
- Germany (0.04)
- Romania (0.04)
- Spain (0.04)
- Switzerland (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- West Midlands > Birmingham (0.04)
- North America
- Canada > British Columbia (0.04)
- United States
- Alaska (0.04)
- Connecticut > New Haven County
- New Haven (0.04)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Idaho > Ada County
- Boise (0.06)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.05)
- Washington > Whitman County
- Pullman (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- Genre:
- Research Report (1.00)
- Industry:
- Government > Regional Government
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- Law > Labor & Employment Law (0.68)
- Technology: