Robustness and Overcoming Brittleness of AI-Enabled Legal Micro-Directives: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning

This paper examines and extends the legal microdirectives Recent research by legal scholars suggests that the law theories in three crucial respects: might inevitably be transformed into legal microdirectives consisting of legal rules that are derived (1) By indicating that legal micro-directives are from legal standards or that are otherwise produced likely to be AIenabled and evolve over time in automatically or via the consequent derivations of scope and velocity across the autonomous levels of legal goals and then propagated via automation for AI Legal Reasoning [20] [22], everyday use as readily accessible lawful directives throughout society. This paper examines and extends (2) By exploring the tradeoffs between legal the legal micro-directives theories in three crucial standards and legal rules as the imprinters of the respects: (1) By indicating that legal micro-directives micro-directives, and are likely to be AIenabled and evolve over time in scope and velocity across the autonomous levels of AI (3) By illuminating a set of brittleness exposures Legal Reasoning, (2) By exploring the tradeoffs that can undermine legal micro-directives and between legal standards and legal rules as the proffering potential mitigating remedies to seek imprinters of the micro-directives, and (3) By greater robustness in the instantiation and illuminating a set of brittleness exposures that can promulgation of such AIenabled lawful directives.