Clustering based on Stochastic Dominance with application for risk averters and risk seekers

Stock clustering algorithms play a pivotal role in quantitative finance and the asset management industry, serving as a core mechanism for understanding market complexity and conducting asset preselection. Their intrinsic value lies in enabling investors to identify the true underlying structure of the stock market, thereby categorizing stocks with similar return characteristics or risk profiles into distinct groups. This data-driven market segmentation not only significantly reduces the computational dimensionality involved in portfolio construction but also provides a solid foundation for formulating differentiated investment strategies. A review of existing literature reveals that scholars both domestic and international have achieved fruitful results in stock clustering. Traditional clustering research predominantly employs classic machine learning algorithms: Xiaojun (2019) and Wu et al. (2022) utilized the K-means algorithm for stock partitioning; Huang et al. (2010) and Lu et al. (2020) explored the sectoral structures of the SSE 50 Index and other markets based on Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) and Spectral Clustering; Korzeniewski (2018) further introduced the Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) algorithm to construct portfolios with enhanced risk resistance. In recent years, with the advancement of deep learning, L ucio and Caiado (2022) and Siregar and Yosia (2024) have attempted to incorporate time-series models (such as TGARCH) or specific market features (e.g., Indonesian stock data) into clustering frameworks. However, despite their respective merits in capturing market trends, these methods share a common limitation: traditional stock clustering approaches predominantly rely exclusively on stock-specific information (e.g., price, volatility, or financial metrics), neglecting the heterogeneity of market participants--namely, the "investors". In reality, investors are typically categorized into three distinct types based on their risk preferences: risk-averse, risk-seeking, and risk-neutral. Divergent risk attitudes inevitably lead to fundamentally different asset selection logic.