GuideNav: User-Informed Development of a Vision-Only Robotic Navigation Assistant For Blind Travelers
Hwang, Hochul, Yang, Soowan, Monon, Jahir Sadik, Giudice, Nicholas A, Lee, Sunghoon Ivan, Biswas, Joydeep, Kim, Donghyun
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
While commendable progress has been made in user-centric research on mobile assistive systems for blind and low-vision (BLV) individuals, references that directly inform robot navigation design remain rare. To bridge this gap, we conducted a comprehensive human study involving interviews with 26 guide dog handlers, four white cane users, nine guide dog trainers, and one O\&M trainer, along with 15+ hours of observing guide dog-assisted walking. After de-identification, we open-sourced the dataset to promote human-centered development and informed decision-making for assistive systems for BLV people. Building on insights from this formative study, we developed GuideNav, a vision-only, teach-and-repeat navigation system. Inspired by how guide dogs are trained and assist their handlers, GuideNav autonomously repeats a path demonstrated by a sighted person using a robot. Specifically, the system constructs a topological representation of the taught route, integrates visual place recognition with temporal filtering, and employs a relative pose estimator to compute navigation actions - all without relying on costly, heavy, power-hungry sensors such as LiDAR. In field tests, GuideNav consistently achieved kilometer-scale route following across five outdoor environments, maintaining reliability despite noticeable scene variations between teach and repeat runs. A user study with 3 guide dog handlers and 1 guide dog trainer further confirmed the system's feasibility, marking (to our knowledge) the first demonstration of a quadruped mobile system retrieving a path in a manner comparable to guide dogs.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Dec-9-2025
- Country:
- Asia
- China > Shaanxi Province
- Xi'an (0.04)
- India (0.04)
- Japan > Honshū
- Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
- Malaysia > Penang (0.04)
- Singapore > Central Region
- Singapore (0.04)
- South Korea > Daegu
- Daegu (0.04)
- China > Shaanxi Province
- Europe
- Austria > Vienna (0.14)
- Germany > Hamburg (0.04)
- Greece (0.04)
- Netherlands > North Holland
- Amsterdam (0.04)
- Sweden > Stockholm
- Stockholm (0.04)
- Switzerland (0.04)
- United Kingdom
- England (0.04)
- Scotland > City of Glasgow
- Glasgow (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Pennsylvania > Allegheny County
- Pittsburgh (0.04)
- California
- San Mateo County > Menlo Park (0.04)
- Santa Clara County > San Jose (0.04)
- Massachusetts
- Hampshire County > Amherst (0.14)
- Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Michigan > Wayne County
- Detroit (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- Tennessee > Davidson County
- Nashville (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- New York
- Montgomery County > Amsterdam (0.04)
- New York County > New York City (0.05)
- Hawaii > Honolulu County
- Honolulu (0.04)
- Maine > Penobscot County
- Orono (0.14)
- New Jersey > Middlesex County
- Piscataway (0.05)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.14)
- Pennsylvania > Allegheny County
- Asia
- Genre:
- Questionnaire & Opinion Survey (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine > Consumer Health (1.00)
- Technology: