Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation
Pagh, Rasmus, Retschmeier, Lukas, Wu, Hao, Zhang, Hanwen
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We study the problem of privately releasing an approximate minimum spanning tree (MST). Given a graph $G = (V, E, \vec{W})$ where $V$ is a set of $n$ vertices, $E$ is a set of $m$ undirected edges, and $ \vec{W} \in \mathbb{R}^{|E|} $ is an edge-weight vector, our goal is to publish an approximate MST under edge-weight differential privacy, as introduced by Sealfon in PODS 2016, where $V$ and $E$ are considered public and the weight vector is private. Our neighboring relation is $\ell_\infty$-distance on weights: for a sensitivity parameter $\Delta_\infty$, graphs $ G = (V, E, \vec{W}) $ and $ G' = (V, E, \vec{W}') $ are neighboring if $\|\vec{W}-\vec{W}'\|_\infty \leq \Delta_\infty$. Existing private MST algorithms face a trade-off, sacrificing either computational efficiency or accuracy. We show that it is possible to get the best of both worlds: With a suitable random perturbation of the input that does not suffice to make the weight vector private, the result of any non-private MST algorithm will be private and achieves a state-of-the-art error guarantee. Furthermore, by establishing a connection to Private Top-k Selection [Steinke and Ullman, FOCS '17], we give the first privacy-utility trade-off lower bound for MST under approximate differential privacy, demonstrating that the error magnitude, $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2})$, is optimal up to logarithmic factors. That is, our approach matches the time complexity of any non-private MST algorithm and at the same time achieves optimal error. We complement our theoretical treatment with experiments that confirm the practicality of our approach.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Dec-13-2024
- Country:
- Asia > Japan
- Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.14)
- Europe
- Denmark > Capital Region
- Copenhagen (0.05)
- Hungary > Hajdú-Bihar County
- Debrecen (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Denmark > Capital Region
- North America
- Canada > Ontario
- Waterloo Region > Waterloo (0.04)
- United States
- California
- Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- Los Angeles County
- Long Beach (0.04)
- Pasadena (0.04)
- Monterey County > Monterey (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Virginia > Alexandria County
- Alexandria (0.04)
- California
- Canada > Ontario
- Asia > Japan
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.46)
- Technology: