Controlled LLM-based Reasoning for Clinical Trial Retrieval
Jullien, Mael, Bogatu, Alex, Unsworth, Harriet, Freitas, Andre
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Matching patients to clinical trials demands a systematic and reasoned interpretation of documents which require significant expert-level background knowledge, over a complex set of well-defined eligibility criteria. Moreover, this interpretation process needs to operate at scale, over vast knowledge bases of trials. In this paper, we propose a scalable method that extends the capabilities of LLMs in the direction of systematizing the reasoning over sets of medical eligibility criteria, evaluating it in the context of real-world cases. The proposed method overlays a Set-guided reasoning method for LLMs. The proposed framework is evaluated on TREC 2022 Clinical Trials, achieving results superior to the state-of-the-art: NDCG@10 of 0.693 and Precision@10 of 0.73.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-19-2024
- Country:
- Europe
- Switzerland (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Greater Manchester > Manchester (0.04)
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe
- Genre:
- Research Report
- Experimental Study (1.00)
- New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine
- Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (1.00)
- Therapeutic Area
- Psychiatry/Psychology (1.00)
- Endocrinology (1.00)
- Internal Medicine (0.68)
- Pulmonary/Respiratory Diseases (1.00)
- Nephrology (1.00)
- Genetic Disease (0.93)
- Musculoskeletal (1.00)
- Obstetrics/Gynecology (0.68)
- Immunology (1.00)
- Cardiology/Vascular Diseases (1.00)
- Hepatology (1.00)
- Gastroenterology (1.00)
- Oncology (1.00)
- Rheumatology (1.00)
- Ophthalmology/Optometry (1.00)
- Neurology > Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (0.46)
- Infections and Infectious Diseases (1.00)
- Hematology > Stem Cells (0.47)
- Health & Medicine
- Technology: