Quantifying Geospatial in the Common Crawl Corpus
Ilyankou, Ilya, Wang, Meihui, Haworth, James, Cavazzi, Stefano
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit emerging geospatial capabilities, stemming from their pre-training on vast unlabelled text datasets that are often derived from the Common Crawl corpus. However, the geospatial content within CC remains largely unexplored, impacting our understanding of LLMs' spatial reasoning. This paper investigates the prevalence of geospatial data in recent Common Crawl releases using Gemini, a powerful language model. By analyzing a sample of documents and manually revising the results, we estimate that between 1 in 5 and 1 in 6 documents contain geospatial information such as coordinates and street addresses. Our findings provide quantitative insights into the nature and extent of geospatial data within Common Crawl, and web crawl data in general. Furthermore, we formulate questions to guide future investigations into the geospatial content of available web crawl datasets and its influence on LLMs.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-7-2024
- Country:
- Asia
- Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- South Korea > Seoul
- Seoul (0.04)
- Europe
- Austria > Styria
- Graz (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Hampshire > Southampton (0.04)
- Austria > Styria
- North America
- Canada > Ontario
- Toronto (0.04)
- United States
- California
- Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.04)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.05)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.04)
- Pennsylvania (0.04)
- California
- Canada > Ontario
- South America > Uruguay
- Montevideo > Montevideo (0.04)
- Asia
- Genre:
- Overview (0.87)
- Research Report (1.00)
- Technology: