A Formal Critique of the Value of the Colombian P\'aramo

ESF thus beckons the valuation of ecosystem services (VES) as a means to signalling nature's contribution to the (re)production of value (Barbier et al., 2009; Villa et al., 2009; Fisher et al., 2010; Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2016); for value is the central category of modern capitalist societies, and the valorisation of value -- i.e., economic growth sublimated into economic development -- their driving force (see, e.g., Mankiw (2016) and Holden et al. (2017)). VES is, in this sense, inscribed in an interpretive approach to modern capitalist praxis, not only invoking assumptions that are instrumentally validated in a retroactive manner, but also taking for granted precisely those historical and material conditions which VES is meant to interpret and, in doing so, reproduce. Overlooking the historical basis of ESF and VES has important practical consequences. When VES practitioners elicit value, a moment or specific field of the social praxis embodied in the valorisation of value is inaugurated, allowing value to mediate other social constructs built around the idea of nature. Since the patterns of actions that make up the capitalist social praxis are presupposed within this new ambit, value takes on a transhistorical quality that justifies its allencompassing and unreflective usage (see, e.g., Badura et al. (2016) and Gómez-Baggethun and Martín-López (2015)).