AI and the Decentering of Disciplinary Creativity

This concern was likely well-founded. After all, Poincaré, von Neumann, Gauss, and Feynman have all been credited with remarkable contributions to mathematics and physics owing in large part to their tremendously fine numerical intuition, itself iteratively refined through a lifetime of obsessive internal calculation. More recently, philosophers and scientists have begun to wrestle with a set of epistemological concerns that arise from the use of forms of computation in science that are far more powerful than mere calculators. For instance, it has been argued that increasingly routine reliance on artificial intelligence leads scientists to adopt beliefs that are not fully justifiable due to the complexity and opacity of the models that support them. Moreover, it has been argued that the epistemic opacity of these systems limits scientific understanding of the phenomena under investigation, perhaps raising a dark veil between the practice of science and scientific knowledge.