Understanding Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Healthcare Perspective
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Fairness in AI-driven decision-making systems has become a critical concern, especially when these systems directly affect human lives. This paper explores the public's comprehension of fairness in healthcare recommendations. We conducted a survey where participants selected from four fairness metrics -- Demographic Parity, Equal Accuracy, Equalized Odds, and Positive Predictive Value -- across different healthcare scenarios to assess their understanding of these concepts. Our findings reveal that fairness is a complex and often misunderstood concept, with a generally low level of public understanding regarding fairness metrics in recommender systems. This study highlights the need for enhanced information and education on algorithmic fairness to support informed decision-making in using these systems. Furthermore, the results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to fairness may be insufficient, pointing to the importance of context-sensitive designs in developing equitable AI systems.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-9-2024
- Country:
- South America > Chile
- North America > United States
- West Virginia (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.05)
- Europe
- Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland
- Gothenburg (0.05)
- Italy > Apulia
- Bari (0.05)
- Sweden > Vaestra Goetaland
- Genre:
- Research Report
- New Finding (1.00)
- Experimental Study (0.67)
- Research Report
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- Technology: