Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Expert Systems


A Narrative Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Offloading Footwear for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Offloading footwear helps prevent and treat diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) by lowering plantar pressure (PP), yet prescription decisions remain fragmented: feature selection varies, personalization is limited, and evaluation practices differ. We performed a narrative review of 45 studies (12 guidelines/protocols, 25 knowledge-based systems, 8 machine-learning applications) published to Aug 2025. We thematically analyzed knowledge type, decision logic, evaluation methods, and enabling technologies. Guidelines emphasize PP thresholds (<=200 kPa or >=25--30\% reduction) but rarely yield actionable, feature-level outputs. Knowledge-based systems use rule- and sensor-driven logic, integrating PP monitoring, adherence tracking, and usability testing. ML work introduces predictive, optimization, and generative models with high computational accuracy but limited explainability and clinical validation. Evaluation remains fragmented: protocols prioritize biomechanical tests; knowledge-based systems assess usability/adherence; ML studies focus on technical accuracy with weak linkage to long-term outcomes. From this synthesis we propose a five-part CDSS framework: (1) a minimum viable dataset; (2) a hybrid architecture combining rules, optimization, and explainable ML; (3) structured feature-level outputs; (4) continuous validation and evaluation; and (5) integration with clinical and telehealth workflows. This framework aims to enable scalable, patient-centered CDSSs for DFU care; prioritizing interoperable datasets, explainable models, and outcome-focused evaluation will be key to clinical adoption.


Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Scholarly work and communication encompass the entire system in which research and creative works are created, evaluated for quality, disseminated to the academic community and beyond, used, and preserved for future use. It includes formal publications, such as journal articles and books, as well as informal sharing through preprints, conference presentations, data sharing, and broader engagement with scholarly works and research outputs. Scholarly knowledge serves as the primary engine of progress, shaping our world and guiding our collective future. It forms the backbone of technological advancement, public health systems, and sustainable environmental practices. Obtained through rigorous methods of observation, experimentation, and validation, it is a reliable resource that helps societies solve complex problems and improve the quality of life by achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs) [6]. To be truly useful, scholarly knowledge must first be systematically extracted and organized. However, the scholarly community of today faces the problem of an overload of scientific papers in their respective domains. There is an increasing number of papers published every year (currently, 3 million), in addition to more than 200 million papers that have already been published . This gives rise to the research question: "How can we provide a reliable and living scholarly knowledge base that empowers researchers to query, synthesize, and analyze the vast body of scholarly knowledge?"


LMEnt: A Suite for Analyzing Knowledge in Language Models from Pretraining Data to Representations

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Language models (LMs) increasingly drive real-world applications that require world knowledge. However, the internal processes through which models turn data into representations of knowledge and beliefs about the world, are poorly understood. Insights into these processes could pave the way for developing LMs with knowledge representations that are more consistent, robust, and complete. To facilitate studying these questions, we present LMEnt, a suite for analyzing knowledge acquisition in LMs during pretraining. LMEnt introduces: (1) a knowledge-rich pretraining corpus, fully annotated with entity mentions, based on Wikipedia, (2) an entity-based retrieval method over pretraining data that outperforms previous approaches by as much as 80.4%, and (3) 12 pretrained models with up to 1B parameters and 4K intermediate checkpoints, with comparable performance to popular open-sourced models on knowledge benchmarks. Together, these resources provide a controlled environment for analyzing connections between entity mentions in pretraining and downstream performance, and the effects of causal interventions in pretraining data. We show the utility of LMEnt by studying knowledge acquisition across checkpoints, finding that fact frequency is key, but does not fully explain learning trends. We release LMEnt to support studies of knowledge in LMs, including knowledge representations, plasticity, editing, attribution, and learning dynamics.huggingface.co/LMEnt


Look: AI at Work! -- Analysing Key Aspects of AI-support at the Work Place

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

In this paper we present an analysis of technological and psychological factors of applying artificial intelligence (AI) at the work place. We do so for a number of twelve application cases in the context of a project where AI is integrated at work places and in work systems of the future. From a technological point of view we mainly look at the areas of AI that the applications are concerned with. This allows to formulate recommendations in terms of what to look at in developing an AI application and what to pay attention to with regards to building AI literacy with different stakeholders using the system. This includes the importance of high-quality data for training learning-based systems as well as the integration of human expertise, especially with knowledge-based systems. In terms of the psychological factors we derive research questions to investigate in the development of AI supported work systems and to consider in future work, mainly concerned with topics such as acceptance, openness, and trust in an AI system.


A Comparative Analysis of Reinforcement Learning and Conventional Deep Learning Approaches for Bearing Fault Diagnosis

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Bearing faults in rotating machinery can lead to significant operational disruptions and maintenance costs. Modern methods for bearing fault diagnosis rely heavily on vibration analysis and machine learning techniques, which often require extensive labeled data and may not adapt well to dynamic environments. This study explores the feasibility of reinforcement learning (RL), specifically Deep Q-Networks (DQNs), for bearing fault classification tasks in machine condition monitoring to enhance the accuracy and adaptability of bearing fault diagnosis. The results demonstrate that while RL models developed in this study can match the performance of traditional supervised learning models under controlled conditions, they excel in adaptability when equipped with optimized reward structures. However, their computational demands highlight areas for further improvement. These findings demonstrate RL's potential to complement traditional methods, paving the way for adaptive diagnostic frameworks.


Structure and Destructure: Dual Forces in the Making of Knowledge Engines

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The making of knowledge engines in natural language processing has been shaped by two seemingly distinct paradigms: one grounded in structure, the other driven by massively available unstructured data. The structured paradigm leverages predefined symbolic interactions, such as knowledge graphs, as priors and designs models to capture them. In contrast, the unstructured paradigm centers on scaling transformer architectures with increasingly vast data and model sizes, as seen in modern large language models. Despite their divergence, this thesis seeks to establish conceptual connections bridging these paradigms. Two complementary forces, structure and destructure, emerge across both paradigms: structure organizes seen symbolic interactions, while destructure, through periodic embedding resets, improves model plasticity and generalization to unseen scenarios. These connections form a new recipe for developing general knowledge engines that can support transparent, controllable, and adaptable intelligent systems.


Linking heterogeneous microstructure informatics with expert characterization knowledge through customized and hybrid vision-language representations for industrial qualification

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Rapid and reliable qualification of advanced materials remains a bottleneck in industrial manufacturing, particularly for heterogeneous structures produced via non-conventional additive manufacturing processes. This study introduces a novel framework that links microstructure informatics with a range of expert characterization knowledge using customized and hybrid vision-language representations (VLRs). By integrating deep semantic segmentation with pre-trained multi-modal models (CLIP and FLAVA), we encode both visual microstructural data and textual expert assessments into shared representations. To overcome limitations in general-purpose embeddings, we develop a customized similarity-based representation that incorporates both positive and negative references from expert-annotated images and their associated textual descriptions. This allows zero-shot classification of previously unseen microstructures through a net similarity scoring approach. Validation on an additively manufactured metal matrix composite dataset demonstrates the framework's ability to distinguish between acceptable and defective samples across a range of characterization criteria. Comparative analysis reveals that FLAVA model offers higher visual sensitivity, while the CLIP model provides consistent alignment with the textual criteria. Z-score normalization adjusts raw unimodal and cross-modal similarity scores based on their local dataset-driven distributions, enabling more effective alignment and classification in the hybrid vision-language framework. The proposed method enhances traceability and interpretability in qualification pipelines by enabling human-in-the-loop decision-making without task-specific model retraining. By advancing semantic interoperability between raw data and expert knowledge, this work contributes toward scalable and domain-adaptable qualification strategies in engineering informatics.


Governable AI: Provable Safety Under Extreme Threat Models

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

As AI rapidly advances, the security risks posed by AI are becoming increasingly severe, especially in critical scenarios, including those posing existential risks. If AI becomes uncontrollable, manipulated, or actively evades safety mechanisms, it could trigger systemic disasters. Existing AI safety approaches-such as model enhancement, value alignment, and human intervention-suffer from fundamental, in-principle limitations when facing AI with extreme motivations and unlimited intelligence, and cannot guarantee security. To address this challenge, we propose a Governable AI (GAI) framework that shifts from traditional internal constraints to externally enforced structural compliance based on cryptographic mechanisms that are computationally infeasible to break, even for future AI, under the defined threat model and well-established cryptographic assumptions.The GAI framework is composed of a simple yet reliable, fully deterministic, powerful, flexible, and general-purpose rule enforcement module (REM); governance rules; and a governable secure super-platform (GSSP) that offers end-to-end protection against compromise or subversion by AI. The decoupling of the governance rules and the technical platform further enables a feasible and generalizable technical pathway for the safety governance of AI. REM enforces the bottom line defined by governance rules, while GSSP ensures non-bypassability, tamper-resistance, and unforgeability to eliminate all identified attack vectors. This paper also presents a rigorous formal proof of the security properties of this mechanism and demonstrates its effectiveness through a prototype implementation evaluated in representative high-stakes scenarios.


Skill-based Explanations for Serendipitous Course Recommendation

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Academic choice is crucial in U.S. undergraduate education, allowing students significant freedom in course selection. However, navigating the complex academic environment is challenging due to limited information, guidance, and an overwhelming number of choices, compounded by time restrictions and the high demand for popular courses. Although career counselors exist, their numbers are insufficient, and course recommendation systems, though personalized, often lack insight into student perceptions and explanations to assess course relevance. In this paper, a deep learning-based concept extraction model is developed to efficiently extract relevant concepts from course descriptions to improve the recommendation process. Using this model, the study examines the effects of skill-based explanations within a serendipitous recommendation framework, tested through the AskOski system at the University of California, Berkeley. The findings indicate that these explanations not only increase user interest, particularly in courses with high unexpectedness, but also bolster decision-making confidence. This underscores the importance of integrating skill-related data and explanations into educational recommendation systems.


Building Task Bots with Self-learning for Enhanced Adaptability, Extensibility, and Factuality

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This thesis examines the obstacles and potential solutions for creating such bots, focusing on innovative techniques that enable bots to learn and adapt autonomously in constantly changing environments. End-to-end task bots, typically built using a static and limited corpus, face difficulties when deployed online due to three primary factors tied to this limitation. First, they might confront queries featuring unexpected linguistic patterns or slot values (i.e., unseen user behaviors). Second, they could potentially face requirements for new functions or tasks (i.e., task definition extensions). Third, even when equipped with relevant knowledge, these bots may produce responses that appear plausible but are actually incorrect (i.e., "hallucinations"). Addressing these challenges is vital for enhancing task bots' performance and reliability in real-world settings.