Evolving continuously is referred to be as a revolution. Yes, we the mankind are igniting the speed of revolution by tremendously improving our lifestyles technically and socially at lightning speed. Robotics is one such evidence of Human intelligence which proved that there is no word called as Impossible in our dictionary. Robotics is an amalgam of different engineering branches like Mechanical, Electrical and Computer Sciences. Each and every department plays a key role in designing and developing the new ideas of Robot science.

Marketers today are charged with injecting their intelligence into the process or the system, burdening themselves and not leveraging their capabilities. The new era of marketing will innately merge AI and human creativity to optimize any campaign or marketing strategy. I've been going back and forth with the concept of innately intelligent marketing for many months now. It may sound like a vague phrase devoid of much meaning, but I promise to illuminate what it means for us marketers. First, the inspiration behind the notion of innate intelligence: I'm a biology and natural science buff and, as you know, our body possesses instinct – We inhabit a wonderous machine that just knows what to do - our immune system knows when to kick in, our metabolism keeps us up and running, we have the ability to heal ourselves.

Steve Jobs was fond of saying that the key to Apple's success has been a marriage of technology and the liberal arts. What he meant by this is that innovation emerges at the intersection of art and technology– rather than either alone. In fact, it was Douglas Engelbart who first understood the importance of computer technologies in bootstrapping human capabilities and augmenting human creativity. Building on Engelbart's thinking, we need to begin to better comprehend the challenges of machine intelligence in the context of human creativity and innovation-- particularly with regard to our systems of learning and education. Since its inception some sixty years ago, artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from an arcane academic field into a powerful driver of social and economic change.

AI to advise us how to structure our days for the most fulfilling life?Depositphotos enhanced by CogWorld "What people don't realize is that we are on the verge of a paradigmatic shift in thinking on par with the Copernican Revolution," says Dr. Angel Iscovich. "The way we make our most personal decisions--from our partners, to our health choices, to yes, even our daily routines-- is going to transform due to the falling cost of data storage and rising computing power." If you only happened to glance at what Dr. Iscovich said, let me repeat the latter part as it bears further mention. According to him, in the future, AI will advise us how to structure our days for the most fulfilling life. It will literally tell us what to do for optimal living.

How well do you remember your old chemistry lessons? Did you switch off when it was time to put your goggles on or did you burn with curiosity? If it's the latter then this Playbuzz quiz is certainly for you. Think you have what it takes to get 10/10? Answer the questions below and then scroll to the end of the page to find out how you did.

Gennady Stolyarov II, who is the Chairman of the U.S. Transhumanist Party, served as the interviewer, whereby he asked Kurzweil a number of questions involving Sophie the robot, Watson-based medical diagnostics, and the potential risks of our future. But, of course, no interview involving Kurzweil goes without discussing the pace of AI in relation to human intelligence. Using examples of modern-day AI like AlphaGo, there are clear signs that they're already starting to outpace human intelligence involving specific tasks. This has been a common factor of AI for the last couple decades, starting with the simple goal of defeating the world's best (human) chess players. Today, they're outpacing us in chess, Go, various strategic computer games, and even medical diagnostics.

We have created a world where our need to perform certain tasks has been greatly alleviated. But for a society enamored with technology and the need for the "next best thing" fueling some people's desires for personal advancement, are we creating a world where we are freely giving away that power? As the founding CEO of a digital health company, I have worked with artificial intelligence technologies in the clinical genomics space. Advancement for the sake of advancement is a noble belief, but in my opinion, it can sometimes lack a stable footing in reality. It's a narrative that has been used to justify industrial modernity, and in doing so, it has become accepted as the recipe to the progression of our civilization.

Should we be afraid of artificial intelligence? For me, this is a simple question with an even simpler, two letter answer: no. But not everyone agrees – many people, including the late physicist Stephen Hawking, have raised concerns that the rise of powerful AI systems could spell the end for humanity. Clearly, your view on whether AI will take over the world will depend on whether you think it can develop intelligent behavior surpassing that of humans – something referred to as "super intelligence". So let's take a look at how likely this is, and why there is much concern about the future of AI.

Data has become the most valuable currency in business. But without the right tools or intelligence, its true value will not be realised. According to a MiQ survey, 43 per cent of US and UK brand marketers think that the lack of measurement of business impact, such as sales or growth, is the main hurdle to investing more in data analytics. But if marketing metrics are not the same as business goals, why are campaigns measured against them? Marketing should align with the same goals as the rest of the company, in order to measure tangible business results.

In the popular TV show Sherlock, visual depictions of our hero's deductive reasoning often look like machine algorithms. And probably not by accident, given that this version of Conan Doyle's detective processes tremendous amounts of observed data--the sort of minutiae that the average person tends to pass over or forget--more like a computer than a human. Sherlock's intelligence is both strength and limitation. His way of thinking is often bounded by an inability to intuitively understand social and emotional contexts. The show's central premise is that Sherlock Holmes needs his friend John Watson to help him synthesize empirical data into human truth.