Goto

Collaborating Authors

 copilot


Microsoft Copilot claims it can set reminders. My phone never buzzed

PCWorld

PCWorld tested Microsoft Copilot's new reminder feature for Android and iOS phones, which allows setting reminders from a PC similar to old Cortana functions. The feature proved unreliable during testing, with reminders failing to trigger notifications on devices, raising concerns about Copilot's overall utility. With SimilarWeb reporting only 1 percent usage figures for Copilot, this unreliability could further impact user trust and adoption rates. Microsoft has quietly added reminders to Copilot. Well, at least Copilot seems to think so.



Shared Autonomy with IDA: Interventional Diffusion Assistance

Neural Information Processing Systems

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has unearthed the potential to assist humans in controlling advanced technologies. Shared autonomy (SA) facilitates control by combining inputs from a human pilot and an AI copilot. In prior SA studies, the copilot is constantly active in determining the action played at each time step. This limits human autonomy that may have deleterious effects on performance. In general, the amount of helpful copilot assistance varies greatly depending on the task dynamics.


Did Microsoft do anything right in 2025? Wins, fails, and WTF moments

PCWorld

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Did Microsoft do anything right in 2025? From AI overload to price hikes, little Microsoft did during 2025 was worth applauding. Can you name one single, solitary, success Microsoft had in 2025? In the years that PCWorld has catalogued Microsoft's wins, failures, and head-scratching "WTF" moments, there's always been a mix of high points and lows.


LG quietly added an unremovable Microsoft Copilot app to TVs

Engadget

We've confirmed its presence on two LG smart TV models. Microsoft made a big punt this year with Copilot. The company put its AI chatbot into a and has also tried to integrate it into other tech products. The latest place you may find Copilot is on your LG smart television, whether you want it or not. Several LG smart TV owners have taken to over the past few days to complain that they suddenly have a Copilot app on the device and cannot uninstall it.


LG TV owners baffled by a Microsoft Copilot app that can't be removed

PCWorld

PCWorld reports that LG TV owners discovered a Microsoft Copilot app on their smart TVs after a webOS update that cannot be uninstalled. The app stems from LG's partnership with Microsoft for AI TV features, currently functioning as a web shortcut for AI search and recommendations. While users can hide Copilot from their home screen, the inability to completely remove the pre-installed app has frustrated many owners. LG TV owners are expressing confusion and annoyance online after Microsoft Copilot suddenly appeared on their smart TVs, with no option to uninstall the app, Tom's Hardware reports. Copilot was reportedly added to some LG models in conjunction with a recent webOS update and subsequently appears pinned to the home screen.


How people used Microsoft Copilot in 2025, from coding to philosophy

PCWorld

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. In the run-up to Valentine's Day, Microsoft saw a surge in conversations about relationships and personal development. Microsoft has released a new report showing what people used its AI assistant Copilot for in 2025. The analysis is based on 37.5 million de-identified conversations and shows that in addition to productivity, Copilot is used for health, relationships and personalized guidance. Health was particularly prevalent on mobile, with users turning to Copilot around the clock for tips on exercise, routines, and wellness.


HAI-Eval: Measuring Human-AI Synergy in Collaborative Coding

Luo, Hanjun, Ni, Chiming, Wen, Jiaheng, Huang, Zhimu, Wang, Yiran, Liao, Bingduo, Chung, Sylvia, Jin, Yingbin, Li, Xinfeng, Xu, Wenyuan, Wang, XiaoFeng, Salam, Hanan

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

LLM-powered coding agents are reshaping the development paradigm. However, existing evaluation systems, neither traditional tests for humans nor benchmarks for LLMs, fail to capture this shift. They remain focused on well-defined algorithmic problems, which excludes problems where success depends on human-AI collaboration. Such collaborative problems not only require human reasoning to interpret complex contexts and guide solution strategies, but also demand AI efficiency for implementation. To bridge this gap, we introduce HAI-Eval, a unified benchmark designed to measure the synergy of human-AI partnership in coding. HAI-Eval's core innovation is its "Collaboration-Necessary" problem templates, which are intractable for both standalone LLMs and unaided humans, but solvable through effective collaboration. Specifically, HAI-Eval uses 45 templates to dynamically create tasks. It also provides a standardized IDE for human participants and a reproducible toolkit with 450 task instances for LLMs, ensuring an ecologically valid evaluation. We conduct a within-subject study with 45 participants and benchmark their performance against 5 state-of-the-art LLMs under 4 different levels of human intervention. Results show that standalone LLMs and unaided participants achieve poor pass rates (0.67% and 18.89%), human-AI collaboration significantly improves performance to 31.11%. Our analysis reveals an emerging co-reasoning partnership. This finding challenges the traditional human-tool hierarchy by showing that strategic breakthroughs can originate from either humans or AI. HAI-Eval establishes not only a challenging benchmark for next-generation coding agents but also a grounded, scalable framework for assessing core developer competencies in the AI era. Our benchmark and interactive demo will be openly accessible.


Can machines perform a qualitative data analysis? Reading the debate with Alan Turing

De Paoli, Stefano

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

This paper reflects on the literature that rejects the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in qualitative data analysis. It illustrates through empirical evidence as well as critical reflections why the current critical debate is focusing on the wrong problems . The paper proposes that the focus of researching the use of the LLMs for qualitative analysis is not the method per se, but rather the empirical investigation of an artificial system performing an analysis . The paper bui lds on the seminal work of Alan Turing and reads the current debate using key ideas from Turing's "Computing Machinery and Intelligence". Th is paper therefore reframes the debate on qualitative analysis with LLMs and states that ra ther than asking whether machines can perform qualitative analysis in principle, we should ask whether with LLMs we can produce analyses that are sufficiently comparable to human analysts. In the final part the contrary views to performing qualitative analysis with LLMs are analysed using the same writing and rhetorical style that Turing used in his seminal work, to discuss the contrary views to the main question.


Microsoft is making 'Ask Copilot' more prominent in Windows File Explorer

PCWorld

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Microsoft is making'Ask Copilot' more prominent in Windows File Explorer The company is also testing a new AI-powered writing assistant for web text fields. For a while now, it's been possible to right-click on a file in Windows File Explorer and select the Ask Copilot option, which launches the Copilot app with the file in question as part of the prompt. But it seems this isn't enough for Microsoft. According to Windows Latest, a new feature called "Ask Microsoft 365 Copilot" is currently being planned for a future release.