Developing policies that can adjust to non-stationary environments is essential for real-world reinforcement learning applications. However, learning such adaptable policies in offline settings, with only a limited set of pre-collected trajectories, presents significant challenges. A key difficulty arises because the limited offline data makes it hard for the context encoder to differentiate between changes in the environment dynamics and shifts in the behavior policy, often leading to context misassociations. To address this issue, we introduce a novel approach called Debiased Offline Representation for fast online Adaptation (DORA). DORA incorporates an information bottleneck principle that maximizes mutual information between the dynamics encoding and the environmental data, while minimizing mutual information between the dynamics encoding and the actions of the behavior policy. We present a practical implementation of DORA, leveraging tractable bounds of the information bottleneck principle. Our experimental evaluation across six benchmark MuJoCo tasks with variable parameters demonstrates that DORA not only achieves a more precise dynamics encoding but also significantly outperforms existing baselines in terms of performance.

Modern recommendation systems can be broadly divided into two key stages: the ranking stage, where the system predicts various user engagements (e.g., click-through rate, like rate, follow rate, watch time), and the value model stage, which aggregates these predictive scores through a function (e.g., a linear combination defined by a weight vector) to measure the value of each content by a single numerical score. Both stages play roughly equally important roles in real industrial systems; however, how to optimize the model weights for the second stage still lacks systematic study. This paper focuses on optimizing the second stage through auto-tuning technology. Although general auto-tuning systems and solutions - both from established production practices and open-source solutions - can address this problem, they typically require weeks or even months to identify a feasible solution. Such prolonged tuning processes are unacceptable in production environments for recommendation systems, as suboptimal value models can severely degrade user experience. An effective auto-tuning solution is required to identify a viable model within 2-3 days, rather than the extended timelines typically associated with existing approaches. In this paper, we introduce a practical auto-tuning system named HyperZero that addresses these time constraints while effectively solving the unique challenges inherent in modern recommendation systems. Moreover, this framework has the potential to be expanded to broader tuning tasks within recommendation systems.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has achieved remarkable success in various research domains. However, its reliance on neural networks results in a lack of transparency, which limits its practical applications. To achieve explainability, decision trees have emerged as a popular and promising alternative to neural networks. Nonetheless, due to their limited expressiveness, traditional decision trees struggle with high-dimensional long-horizon continuous control tasks. In this paper, we proposes SkillTree, a novel framework that reduces complex continuous action spaces into discrete skill spaces. Our hierarchical approach integrates a differentiable decision tree within the high-level policy to generate skill embeddings, which subsequently guide the low-level policy in executing skills. By making skill decisions explainable, we achieve skill-level explainability, enhancing the understanding of the decision-making process in complex tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves performance comparable to skill-based neural networks in complex robotic arm control domains. Furthermore, SkillTree offers explanations at the skill level, thereby increasing the transparency of the decision-making process.

Given the inherent non-stationarity prevalent in real-world applications, continual Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to equip the agent with the capability to address a series of sequentially presented decision-making tasks. Within this problem setting, a pivotal challenge revolves around \textit{catastrophic forgetting} issue, wherein the agent is prone to effortlessly erode the decisional knowledge associated with past encountered tasks when learning the new one. In recent progresses, the \textit{generative replay} methods have showcased substantial potential by employing generative models to replay data distribution of past tasks. Compared to storing the data from past tasks directly, this category of methods circumvents the growing storage overhead and possible data privacy concerns. However, constrained by the expressive capacity of generative models, existing \textit{generative replay} methods face challenges in faithfully reconstructing the data distribution of past tasks, particularly in scenarios with a myriad of tasks or high-dimensional data. Inspired by the success of diffusion models in various generative tasks, this paper introduces a novel continual RL algorithm DISTR (Diffusion-based Trajectory Replay) that employs a diffusion model to memorize the high-return trajectory distribution of each encountered task and wakeups these distributions during the policy learning on new tasks. Besides, considering the impracticality of replaying all past data each time, a prioritization mechanism is proposed to prioritize the trajectory replay of pivotal tasks in our method. Empirical experiments on the popular continual RL benchmark \texttt{Continual World} demonstrate that our proposed method obtains a favorable balance between \textit{stability} and \textit{plasticity}, surpassing various existing continual RL baselines in average success rate.

We consider the problem of adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) pre-trained with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to downstream preference data. Naive approaches to achieve this could be supervised fine-tuning on preferred responses or reinforcement learning with a learned reward model. However, the LLM runs the risk of forgetting its initial knowledge as the fine-tuning progresses. To customize the LLM while preserving its existing capabilities, this paper proposes a novel method, named as Q-Adapter. We start by formalizing LLM adaptation as a problem of maximizing the linear combination of two rewards, one of which corresponds to the reward optimized by the pre-trained LLM and the other to the downstream preference data. Although both rewards are unknown, we show that this can be solved by directly learning a new module from the preference data that approximates the \emph{residual Q-function}. We consider this module to be an adapter because the original pre-trained LLM, together with it, can form the optimal customised LLM. Empirically, experiments on a range of domain-specific tasks and safety alignment tasks illustrate the superiority of Q-Adapter in both anti-forgetting and learning from new preferences.

Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has gained wide attention in recent years and has made progress in various fields. Specifically, cooperative MARL focuses on training a team of agents to cooperatively achieve tasks that are difficult for a single agent to handle. It has shown great potential in applications such as path planning, autonomous driving, active voltage control, and dynamic algorithm configuration. One of the research focuses in the field of cooperative MARL is how to improve the coordination efficiency of the system, while research work has mainly been conducted in simple, static, and closed environment settings. To promote the application of artificial intelligence in real-world, some research has begun to explore multi-agent coordination in open environments. These works have made progress in exploring and researching the environments where important factors might change. However, the mainstream work still lacks a comprehensive review of the research direction. In this paper, starting from the concept of reinforcement learning, we subsequently introduce multi-agent systems (MAS), cooperative MARL, typical methods, and test environments. Then, we summarize the research work of cooperative MARL from closed to open environments, extract multiple research directions, and introduce typical works. Finally, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the current research, and look forward to the future development direction and research problems in cooperative MARL in open environments.

Developing intelligent agents capable of seamless coordination with humans is a critical step towards achieving artificial general intelligence. Existing methods for human-AI coordination typically train an agent to coordinate with a diverse set of policies or with human models fitted from real human data. However, the massively diverse styles of human behavior present obstacles for AI systems with constrained capacity, while high quality human data may not be readily available in real-world scenarios. In this study, we observe that prior to coordination, humans engage in communication to establish conventions that specify individual roles and actions, making their coordination proceed in an orderly manner. Building upon this observation, we propose employing the large language model (LLM) to develop an action plan (or equivalently, a convention) that effectively guides both human and AI. By inputting task requirements, human preferences, the number of agents, and other pertinent information into the LLM, it can generate a comprehensive convention that facilitates a clear understanding of tasks and responsibilities for all parties involved. Furthermore, we demonstrate that decomposing the convention formulation problem into sub-problems with multiple new sessions being sequentially employed and human feedback, will yield a more efficient coordination convention. Experimental evaluations conducted in the Overcooked-AI environment, utilizing a human proxy model, highlight the superior performance of our proposed method compared to existing learning-based approaches. When coordinating with real humans, our method achieves better alignment with human preferences and an average performance improvement of 15% compared to the state-of-the-art.

In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (CMARL), it is critical for agents to achieve a balance between self-exploration and team collaboration. However, agents can hardly accomplish the team task without coordination and they would be trapped in a local optimum where easy cooperation is accessed without enough individual exploration. Recent works mainly concentrate on agents' coordinated exploration, which brings about the exponentially grown exploration of the state space. To address this issue, we propose Self-Motivated Multi-Agent Exploration (SMMAE), which aims to achieve success in team tasks by adaptively finding a trade-off between self-exploration and team cooperation. In SMMAE, we train an independent exploration policy for each agent to maximize their own visited state space. Each agent learns an adjustable exploration probability based on the stability of the joint team policy. The experiments on highly cooperative tasks in StarCraft II micromanagement benchmark (SMAC) demonstrate that SMMAE can explore task-related states more efficiently, accomplish coordinated behaviours and boost the learning performance.

In open multi-agent environments, the agents may encounter unexpected teammates. Classical multi-agent learning approaches train agents that can only coordinate with seen teammates. Recent studies attempted to generate diverse teammates to enhance the generalizable coordination ability, but were restricted by pre-defined teammates. In this work, our aim is to train agents with strong coordination ability by generating teammates that fully cover the teammate policy space, so that agents can coordinate with any teammates. Since the teammate policy space is too huge to be enumerated, we find only dissimilar teammates that are incompatible with controllable agents, which highly reduces the number of teammates that need to be trained with. However, it is hard to determine the number of such incompatible teammates beforehand. We therefore introduce a continual multi-agent learning process, in which the agent learns to coordinate with different teammates until no more incompatible teammates can be found. The above idea is implemented in the proposed Macop (Multi-agent compatible policy learning) algorithm. We conduct experiments in 8 scenarios from 4 environments that have distinct coordination patterns. Experiments show that Macop generates training teammates with much lower compatibility than previous methods. As a result, in all scenarios Macop achieves the best overall coordination ability while never significantly worse than the baselines, showing strong generalization ability.

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (CMARL) has shown to be promising for many real-world applications. Previous works mainly focus on improving coordination ability via solving MARL-specific challenges (e.g., non-stationarity, credit assignment, scalability), but ignore the policy perturbation issue when testing in a different environment. This issue hasn't been considered in problem formulation or efficient algorithm design. To address this issue, we firstly model the problem as a limited policy adversary Dec-POMDP (LPA-Dec-POMDP), where some coordinators from a team might accidentally and unpredictably encounter a limited number of malicious action attacks, but the regular coordinators still strive for the intended goal. Then, we propose Robust Multi-Agent Coordination via Evolutionary Generation of Auxiliary Adversarial Attackers (ROMANCE), which enables the trained policy to encounter diversified and strong auxiliary adversarial attacks during training, thus achieving high robustness under various policy perturbations. Concretely, to avoid the ego-system overfitting to a specific attacker, we maintain a set of attackers, which is optimized to guarantee the attackers high attacking quality and behavior diversity. The goal of quality is to minimize the ego-system coordination effect, and a novel diversity regularizer based on sparse action is applied to diversify the behaviors among attackers. The ego-system is then paired with a population of attackers selected from the maintained attacker set, and alternately trained against the constantly evolving attackers. Extensive experiments on multiple scenarios from SMAC indicate our ROMANCE provides comparable or better robustness and generalization ability than other baselines.