The Role Of Human Judgment As A Presumed Integral Ingredient For Achieving True AI

Is human judgment the crucial missing link needed to achieve true AI? Is the embodiment of human judgment a required ingredient in achieving true AI? It is a rather seemingly simple question to proffer, though any mindful answer is likely to be notably elongated. Slightly restating the question, in order for AI to become a vaunted version of AI, which let's say we might all collegially agree is demarked as the equivalent of human-like intelligence, this weighty question is asking whether there needs to be some means to encompass or include what we variously describe or denote as "human judgment" for AI to be true AI. If you say that yes, of course, the only true AI is the type of AI that showcases its own variant of human judgment, you are then putting forth a challenge and a quest to figure out what human judgment portends and how to somehow get that thing or capability into AI systems. Indeed, please be aware that some assert that human judgment is the missing secret sauce that is the Holy Grail toward arriving at true AI.