AIhub coffee corner: AI risks, pause letters and the ensuing discourse

This month, in light of the recent prominent discussions relating to perceived AI risks, we consider the pause letters and risk statements, the debate around existential threats, and how this discourse could impact the field and public perceptions. Joining the discussion this time are: Sanmay Das (George Mason University), Tom Dietterich (Oregon State University), Sabine Hauert (University of Bristol), Sarit Kraus (Bar-Ilan University), Anna Tahovská (Czech Technical University), and Oskar von Stryk (Technische Universität Darmstadt). Sabine Hauert: In today's discussion we're going to talk about potential AI risks and the recent discourse around existential threats. Does anyone have any hot reactions? How do you feel about the discourse of existential threat? Tom Dietterich: I agree with Emily Bender and a lot of the critics that it's a distraction and a diversion from thinking about the more immediate threats.